Re: [PATCH 2/6] d3d9/tests: Add visual tests for locking vertexbuffers

[Patrick Rudolph]

Am Thu, 28 Jul 2016 14:04:56 +0200
schrieb Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)gmail.com>:
> On 26 July 2016 at 19:09, Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org> wrote:
> > +    static const struct
> > +    {
> > +        const char *flags_s;
> > +        unsigned int flags;
> > +        DWORD usage;
> > +        BOOL unsyncronized;
> > +        BOOL todo;
> > +        BOOL broken;
> > +    }
> > +    /* Nvidia ignores D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE on non dynamic buffers,
> > +     * while AMD always accepts D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE on all
> > buffers. */
> > +    tests[] =
> > +    {
> > +        {"0", 0, 0, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE},
> > +        {"0", 0, D3DUSAGE_DYNAMIC, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE},
> > +        {"D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE", D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE, 0, FALSE,
> > FALSE, TRUE},
> > +        {"D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE", D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE,
> > D3DUSAGE_DYNAMIC, TRUE, FALSE, FALSE},
> > +        {"D3DLOCK_DISCARD", D3DLOCK_DISCARD, 0, FALSE, FALSE,
> > FALSE},
> > +        {"D3DLOCK_DISCARD", D3DLOCK_DISCARD, D3DUSAGE_DYNAMIC,
> > FALSE, FALSE, FALSE},
> > +        {"D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE | D3DLOCK_DISCARD",
> > +                D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE | D3DLOCK_DISCARD, 0, FALSE,
> > FALSE, TRUE},
> > +        {"D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE | D3DLOCK_DISCARD",
> > +                D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE | D3DLOCK_DISCARD,
> > D3DUSAGE_DYNAMIC, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE},
> > +        {"D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE | D3DLOCK_READONLY",
> > +                D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE | D3DLOCK_READONLY, 0, FALSE,
> > FALSE, TRUE},
> > +        {"D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE | D3DLOCK_READONLY",
> > +                D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE | D3DLOCK_READONLY,
> > D3DUSAGE_DYNAMIC, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE},
> > +    };  
> > [...]
> > +        todo_wine_if (tests[i].todo)
> > +        {
> > +            ok(tests[i].unsyncronized == unsyncronized ||
> > broken(tests[i].broken),
> > +                    "Expected buffer mapped %s. Flags = %s. Usage
> > = %#x.\n",
> > +                    tests[i].unsyncronized ? "unsyncronized" :
> > "syncronized", tests[i].flags_s, tests[i].usage);
> > +        }  
> > I assume the broken() is for the testbot, but the way this is written,
> > half the cases aren't really tested on Windows. Also, what makes these
> > fail on the testbot?

I can replace some of the broken test results with another flag for AMD
behaviour. AMD allows D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE for non dynamic buffers on
d3d9, too.
I guess the WARP driver filters D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE | D3DLOCK_DISCARD
calls.
> > +    timestamp1 = GetTickCount();
> > +
> > +    hr = IDirect3DDevice9_BeginScene(device);
> > +    ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "Failed to begin scene, hr %#x.\n", hr);
> > +    hr = IDirect3DDevice9_DrawPrimitive(device,
> > D3DPT_TRIANGLESTRIP, 0, tri);
> > +    ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "Failed to draw, hr %#x.\n", hr);
> > +    hr = IDirect3DDevice9_EndScene(device);
> > +    ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "Failed to end scene, hr %#x.\n", hr);
> > +
> > +    /* dummy read to wait for GPU being done */
> > +    color = getPixelColor(device, 160, 360);
> > +
> > +    timestamp2 = GetTickCount();
> > +
> > +    /* Adjust buffer size for 1 second draw call duration */
> > +    size = (size * 1000UL) / (timestamp2 - timestamp1 + 1);  
> > Does this work reliably? GetTickCount() has very limited resolution, I
> > think there's a real chance that the draw will take only a fraction of
> > GetTickCount()'s resolution.

Yes it does.
I first thought about using timestamp queries, but those aren't
supported on ddraw and d3d8 and are broken on my AMD test system, so
I'm using GetTickCount instead. It allows to test to pass on fast
systems (Intel Core i5 + HD6870) and slow systems (Intel Atom + Nvidia
ION). The buffersize can't be hardcoded as the Windows driver nukes the
display driver whenever a draw call takes more than a few seconds,
which is the case when using huge buffers to make them pass on fast
systems.

Regards,
Patrick

[PATCH 2/6] d3d9/tests: Add visual tests for locking vertexbuffers

[Henri Verbeet]

On 28 July 2016 at 18:41, Patrick Rudolph <siro(a)das-labor.org> wrote:
> Am Thu, 28 Jul 2016 14:04:56 +0200
> schrieb Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)gmail.com>:
> > I assume the broken() is for the testbot, but the way this is written,
> > half the cases aren't really tested on Windows. Also, what makes these
> > fail on the testbot?
>
> I can replace some of the broken test results with another flag for AMD
> behaviour. AMD allows D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE for non dynamic buffers on
> d3d9, too.
> I guess the WARP driver filters D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE | D3DLOCK_DISCARD
> calls.
> You can make the check more specific by using adapter_is_warp(). Wrt.
> D3DLOCK_NOOVERWRITE on non-dynamic buffers, if the behaviour is not
> consistent between AMD and NVIDIA, it's probably best to drop those
> tests while keeping the comment.
> > Does this work reliably? GetTickCount() has very limited resolution, I
> > think there's a real chance that the draw will take only a fraction of
> > GetTickCount()'s resolution.
>
> Yes it does.
> I first thought about using timestamp queries, but those aren't
> supported on ddraw and d3d8 and are broken on my AMD test system, so
> I'm using GetTickCount instead. It allows to test to pass on fast
> systems (Intel Core i5 + HD6870) and slow systems (Intel Atom + Nvidia
> ION). The buffersize can't be hardcoded as the Windows driver nukes the
> display driver whenever a draw call takes more than a few seconds,
> which is the case when using huge buffers to make them pass on fast
> systems.

Measuring CPU time is fine, but I'd feel a little better if this used
QueryPerformanceCounter() instead of GetTickCount().