I've noticed that wine doesn't yet seem to have a winver option for windows server 2003, I suppose it a trivial thing to implement, at least by seeing how quickly this was done for windows xp.
puoti(a)inwind.it wrote:
I've noticed that wine doesn't yet seem to have a winver option for windows server 2003, I suppose it a trivial thing to implement, at least by seeing how quickly this was done for windows xp.
If anyone needs to run regression tests on Windows 2003 Server, I can lay my hands on one (and many other, if needed) Shachar -- Shachar Shemesh Open Source integration consultant Home page & resume - http://www.shemesh.biz/
Le ven 01/08/2003 à 13:02, Shachar Shemesh a écrit :
puoti(a)inwind.it wrote:
I've noticed that wine doesn't yet seem to have a winver option for windows server 2003, I suppose it a trivial thing to implement, at least by seeing how quickly this was done for windows xp.
If anyone needs to run regression tests on Windows 2003 Server, I can lay my hands on one (and many other, if needed)
Could you just send the result of GetVersionExA? I think I have everything else (at least to define the version...) Vincent
Vincent Béron wrote:
Le ven 01/08/2003 à 13:02, Shachar Shemesh a écrit :
puoti(a)inwind.it wrote:
I've noticed that wine doesn't yet seem to have a winver option for windows server 2003, I suppose it a trivial thing to implement, at least by seeing how quickly this was done for windows xp.
If anyone needs to run regression tests on Windows 2003 Server, I can lay my hands on one (and many other, if needed)
Could you just send the result of GetVersionExA?
I think I have everything else (at least to define the version...)
Vincent
Windows 2003 Standard Edition (let me know if you want another edition): Majour Version: 5 Minor Version: 2 Build Number: 3790 Platform ID: 2 CSDVersion empty (NULLs) ServicePackMajor: 0 ServicePackMinor: 0 Reserved: 272, 3 -- Shachar Shemesh Open Source integration consultant Home page & resume - http://www.shemesh.biz/
Le mer 13/08/2003 à 01:40, Shachar Shemesh a écrit :
Vincent Béron wrote:
Could you just send the result of GetVersionExA?
I think I have everything else (at least to define the version...)
Vincent
Windows 2003 Standard Edition (let me know if you want another edition): Majour Version: 5 Minor Version: 2 Build Number: 3790 Platform ID: 2 CSDVersion empty (NULLs) ServicePackMajor: 0 ServicePackMinor: 0 Reserved: 272, 3
Thanks Shachar, but there's still something I'm not sure about. After ServicePackMinor, our winbase.h defines the following fields: WORD wSuiteMask BYTE wProductType BYTE wReserved I suppose your winbase.h only had two WORD wReserved(1,2)? If that's the case, wSuiteMask maps to 272 (VER_SUITE_SINGLEUSERTS|VER_SUITE_TERMINAL), and wProductType to VER_NT_SERVER. That would be our first version advertised as VER_NT_SERVER. Is there a workstation version of 2K3, as earlier NT versions were always defined as that in Wine? Vincent
Vincent Béron wrote:
Le mer 13/08/2003 à 01:40, Shachar Shemesh a écrit :
Windows 2003 Standard Edition (let me know if you want another edition): Majour Version: 5 Minor Version: 2 Build Number: 3790 Platform ID: 2 CSDVersion empty (NULLs) ServicePackMajor: 0 ServicePackMinor: 0 Reserved: 272, 3
Thanks Shachar, but there's still something I'm not sure about.
After ServicePackMinor, our winbase.h defines the following fields: WORD wSuiteMask BYTE wProductType BYTE wReserved
I suppose your winbase.h only had two WORD wReserved(1,2)? If that's the case, wSuiteMask maps to 272 (VER_SUITE_SINGLEUSERTS|VER_SUITE_TERMINAL), and wProductType to VER_NT_SERVER. That would be our first version advertised as VER_NT_SERVER. Is there a workstation version of 2K3, as earlier NT versions were always defined as that in Wine?
Vincent
Windows 2003 comes in three flavours, apparently. Web edition, Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition. All three are considered "Windows 2003 Server". There is no "Windows 2003 Pro", "Home", "Workstation" or whatever. In that respect, yes, it does make sense. The headers I was using are the standard ones that come with Visual Studio 6 SP5. If the struct is supposed to have extra parameters, I have not seen them (I used the debugger's ability to spread a struct's content - I'm lazy that way). If there is some source you want to send me to run, please let me know. I tested everything on Windows 2003 server standard edition. I can install the web or the enterprise editions, but I'm afraid the setup took over an hour for this one, and I actually need it for some testing. If it's really crucial to you, I'll try to install it on a virtual machine (will probably be faster than my PII 233 160MB machine that installed this version). Shachar -- Shachar Shemesh Open Source integration consultant Home page & resume - http://www.shemesh.biz/
Le mer 13/08/2003 à 11:31, Shachar Shemesh a écrit :
Windows 2003 comes in three flavours, apparently. Web edition, Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition. All three are considered "Windows 2003 Server". There is no "Windows 2003 Pro", "Home", "Workstation" or whatever. In that respect, yes, it does make sense.
The headers I was using are the standard ones that come with Visual Studio 6 SP5. If the struct is supposed to have extra parameters, I have not seen them (I used the debugger's ability to spread a struct's content - I'm lazy that way). If there is some source you want to send me to run, please let me know.
No, thanks for the rundown. The patch I sent to wine-patches is correct then.
I tested everything on Windows 2003 server standard edition. I can install the web or the enterprise editions, but I'm afraid the setup took over an hour for this one, and I actually need it for some testing. If it's really crucial to you, I'll try to install it on a virtual machine (will probably be faster than my PII 233 160MB machine that installed this version).
No need to install the other editions for me. Although the question can be asked: which edition do we want Wine to return? Vincent
participants (3)
-
puoti＠inwind.it -
Shachar Shemesh -
Vincent Béron