Re: Allow native dlls and debugmsg in runtest
Uwe Bonnes wrote:
Changelog tools/runtest Allow the use of native dlls and debugmessages (Includes " Allow native dlls in runtest") do we really need this in the scripts ? couldn't we just use the WINEOPTIONS from the command line ? WINEOPTIONS="-debugmsg +foo" runtest instead of what you propose runtest -d "-debugmsg +foo"
just my 2 cents A+ -- Eric Pouech
"Eric" == Eric Pouech <eric.pouech(a)wanadoo.fr> writes:
Eric> Uwe Bonnes wrote: >> Changelog tools/runtest Allow the use of native dlls and >> debugmessages (Includes " Allow native dlls in runtest") Eric> do we really need this in the scripts ? couldn't we just use the Eric> WINEOPTIONS from the command line ? WINEOPTIONS="-debugmsg +foo" Eric> runtest instead of what you propose runtest -d "-debugmsg +foo" Perhaps not, if advice to the user how to do that task is clearly given. But then you have to set and unset WINEOPTIONS quite frequently. Bye -- Uwe Bonnes bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt --------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Uwe Bonnes wrote: [...]
But then you have to set and unset WINEOPTIONS quite frequently.
Not if you type: WINEOPTIONS="-debugmsg +foo" runtest When you do that WINEOPTIONS is set for that command only. The only drawback is 'WINEOPTIONS' is longer to type than '-d', but with command recall who cares. -- Francois Gouget fgouget(a)free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/ Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he'll be a mile away - and barefoot.
"Francois" == Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> writes:
Francois> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Uwe Bonnes wrote: [...] >> But then you have to set and unset WINEOPTIONS quite frequently. Francois> Not if you type: Francois> WINEOPTIONS="-debugmsg +foo" runtest Francois> When you do that WINEOPTIONS is set for that command only. The Francois> only drawback is 'WINEOPTIONS' is longer to type than '-d', Francois> but with command recall who cares. But you need to remember WINEOPTION, how to use and what options are available and the shell syntax. The few lines added to runtest by my test relief the user of that task but also leave you the posibility to still use WINEOPTIONS. Bye -- Uwe Bonnes bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt --------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
Uwe Bonnes wrote:
"Francois" == Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> writes:
Francois> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Uwe Bonnes wrote: [...] >> But then you have to set and unset WINEOPTIONS quite frequently.
Francois> Not if you type:
Francois> WINEOPTIONS="-debugmsg +foo" runtest
Francois> When you do that WINEOPTIONS is set for that command only. The Francois> only drawback is 'WINEOPTIONS' is longer to type than '-d', Francois> but with command recall who cares.
But you need to remember WINEOPTION, how to use and what options are available and the shell syntax. The few lines added to runtest by my test relief the user of that task but also leave you the posibility to still use WINEOPTIONS. the bad side of the patch is that the user has to know the command line option of runtest... moreover, runtest should be used in most of the cases without options it's only developpers would may do some fiddling with options at some point in time, I wouldn't be surprised either if wine drops its command line option in favor of another mechanism so I'd favor not adding too many options to runtest A+
-- Eric Pouech
participants (3)
-
Eric Pouech -
Francois Gouget -
Uwe Bonnes