Folks, I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to release on Tuesday. So if you have bugs that you feel must be fixed for 0.9 (and that can be fixed with minimal changes), now is the time to speak up... -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to release on Tuesday. So if you have bugs that you feel must be fixed for 0.9 (and that can be fixed with minimal changes), now is the time to speak up...
What about the toolbar bug? It makes Front Panel Designer ( http://www.frontpanelexpress.com/download/index.htm ) useless - the selection tool button doesn't work properly once you choose any of the drawing tools! The fix is rather straighforward, and there are some test cases included to confirm it's indeed a bugfix. Why not? Krzysztof
From: "Alexandre Julliard" <julliard(a)winehq.org>
I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to release on Tuesday.
Speaking of which, what's the status for our FC builds? We really need binary builds for Fedora for this release. It would be a pitty to fail to provide binary .rpms for this one, while we have constantly provided them for all the alpha releases for more then one (two?) years now. -- Dimi Paun <dimi(a)lattica.com> Lattica, Inc.
Le ven 21/10/2005 à 10:05, Dimi Paun a écrit :
From: "Alexandre Julliard" <julliard(a)winehq.org>
I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to release on Tuesday.
Speaking of which, what's the status for our FC builds? We really need binary builds for Fedora for this release. It would be a pitty to fail to provide binary .rpms for this one, while we have constantly provided them for all the alpha releases for more then one (two?) years now.
20050930 is on sf for all but CentOS 4 (haven't had time to update my CentOS 4 installation yet). The download page on winehq hasn't been updated yet because it's a mess when all RH-distros are not ready at the same time. I won't be home this week-end, so it'll go to Monday night at the earliest. Vincent
Vincent Béron wrote:
Le ven 21/10/2005 à 10:05, Dimi Paun a écrit :
From: "Alexandre Julliard" <julliard(a)winehq.org>
I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to release on Tuesday.
Speaking of which, what's the status for our FC builds? We really need binary builds for Fedora for this release. It would be a pitty to fail to provide binary .rpms for this one, while we have constantly provided them for all the alpha releases for more then one (two?) years now.
20050930 is on sf for all but CentOS 4 (haven't had time to update my CentOS 4 installation yet). The download page on winehq hasn't been updated yet because it's a mess when all RH-distros are not ready at the same time.
I won't be home this week-end, so it'll go to Monday night at the earliest.
Vincent
Ubuntu/Debian seems to be old. At least apt-get isn't upgrading me: xxxxxx(a)citadel:~$ wine --version Wine 20050725
Alexandre Julliard schrieb:
Folks,
I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to release on Tuesday. So if you have bugs that you feel must be fixed for 0.9 (and that can be fixed with minimal changes), now is the time to speak up...
Yep! Remember the memory layout bug for World of Warcraft. Would be nice to have a config option to enable this. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-October/041119.html And another workaround which need a setup option is for the 'missing target circles bug' in WoW: --- dlls/opengl32/opengl_norm.c +++ dlls/opengl32/opengl_norm.c @@ -2367,7 +2416,7 @@ void WINAPI wine_glPolygonOffset( GLfloat factor, GLfloat units ) { TRACE("(%f, %f)\n", factor, units ); ENTER_GL(); - glPolygonOffset( factor, units ); + glPolygonOffset( -factor, units ); LEAVE_GL(); } chris
On Friday 21 October 2005 23:09, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Folks,
I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to release on Tuesday. So if you have bugs that you feel must be fixed for 0.9 (and that can be fixed with minimal changes), now is the time to speak up...
I probably should do a putback of some local changes I have for Solaris.
Am Freitag, den 21.10.2005, 15:09 +0200 schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
So if you have bugs that you feel must be fixed for 0.9 (and that can be fixed with minimal changes), now is the time to speak up...
Has someone a fix for the "DEL-Key while NumLock is active" - Problem? (inserting a "," after deleting the character right from the cursor) -- By By ... ... Detlef
Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
So if you have bugs that you feel must be fixed for 0.9 (and that can be fixed with minimal changes), now is the time to speak up... Has someone a fix for the "DEL-Key while NumLock is active" - Problem? (inserting a "," after deleting the character right from the cursor)
nope... my vote on this one too! ( http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2400 )
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:09:39 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Folks,
I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to release on Tuesday. So if you have bugs that you feel must be fixed for 0.9 (and that can be fixed with minimal changes), now is the time to speak up...
Did the unicode controls revert/fix go in? If not then I guess lots of apps will misbehave due to WM_GETTEXT not working properly.
Saturday, October 22, 2005, 12:53:36 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:09:39 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Folks,
I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to release on Tuesday. So if you have bugs that you feel must be fixed for 0.9 (and that can be fixed with minimal changes), now is the time to speak up...
Did the unicode controls revert/fix go in? If not then I guess lots of apps will misbehave due to WM_GETTEXT not working properly.
Not exactly a revert but disable patch when in, if there is no active theme selected. Vitaliy
If someone maybe would have an idea for bug #3547 (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3547). I'm sure that a lot of programs TCP problems (emule etc.) came from that socket accept()-problem. I know its still unconfirmed, but easy to reproduce. I think its only a small glitch, and could be done with a small patch for 0.9. But my first bug finding attempts unfortunately failed :-( Markus Gömmel m.goemmel(a)compulab.de "Alexandre Julliard" <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote in message news:87r7af584s.fsf(a)wine.dyndns.org...
Folks,
I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to release on Tuesday. So if you have bugs that you feel must be fixed for 0.9 (and that can be fixed with minimal changes), now is the time to speak up...
-- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
There is a patch for http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3547 available from eric.pouech(a)wanadoo.fr which works great. I would be really happy to see it inside 0.90 Thanks for helping... Markus Goemmel m.goemmel(a)compulab.de "Markus Gömmel" <m.goemmel(a)compulab.de> wrote in message news:dje2cd$795$1(a)sea.gmane.org...
If someone maybe would have an idea for bug #3547 (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3547). I'm sure that a lot of programs TCP problems (emule etc.) came from that socket accept()-problem. I know its still unconfirmed, but easy to reproduce. I think its only a small glitch, and could be done with a small patch for 0.9. But my first bug finding attempts unfortunately failed :-(
Markus Gömmel m.goemmel(a)compulab.de
"Alexandre Julliard" <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote in message news:87r7af584s.fsf(a)wine.dyndns.org...
Folks,
I think we are in good shape for the release; the current plan is to release on Tuesday. So if you have bugs that you feel must be fixed for 0.9 (and that can be fixed with minimal changes), now is the time to speak up...
-- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
participants (12)
-
Alexandre Julliard -
Christoph -
Detlef Riekenberg -
Dimi Paun -
Joseph Garvin -
Krzysztof Foltman -
Markus G�mmel -
Mike Hearn -
Robert Lunnon -
Vincent Béron -
Vitaliy Margolen -
zhilla