Suggestions for fixing test?

[Jakob Eriksson]

http://test.winehq.org/data/200412011000/xp_IDWASEMPTY/gdi32:metafile.txt


Any suggestions for fixing this?


regards,
Jakob

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Jakob Eriksson" <jakov(a)vmlinux.org> wrote:
> http://test.winehq.org/data/200412011000/xp_IDWASEMPTY/gdi32:metafile.txt
>
> Any suggestions for fixing this?

Run the tests from not a service?

-- 
Dmitry.

[Jakob Eriksson]

Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Jakob Eriksson" <jakov(a)vmlinux.org> wrote:
> > http://test.winehq.org/data/200412011000/xp_IDWASEMPTY/gdi32:metafile.txt
> >
> > Any suggestions for fixing this?
>
> Run the tests from not a service?

Yes, that's one way of course. But winrash is a service. Do you suggest we
make it so winrash is no longer a service?

What I want is not it merely make it _possible_ to run winetest with no 
red on:

http://test.winehq.org/data/

I want the list to be all green!

So, should we just stop using winrash or what?


regards,
Jakob

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Jakob Eriksson" <jakov(a)vmlinux.org> wrote:
> Yes, that's one way of course. But winrash is a service. Do you suggest we
> make it so winrash is no longer a service?
>
> What I want is not it merely make it _possible_ to run winetest with no 
> red on:
>
> http://test.winehq.org/data/
>
> I want the list to be all green!
>
> So, should we just stop using winrash or what?

We already discussed this problem some time ago. The conclusion was to instruct
a tester to mark the service as interactive or run the tests manually.

-- 
Dmitry.

[Jakob Eriksson]

Dmitry Timoshkov skrev:
> "Jakob Eriksson" <jakov(a)vmlinux.org> wrote:
> > Yes, that's one way of course. But winrash is a service. Do you suggest we
> > make it so winrash is no longer a service?
> >
> > What I want is not it merely make it _possible_ to run winetest with no 
> > red on:
> >
> > http://test.winehq.org/data/
> >
> > I want the list to be all green!
> >
> > So, should we just stop using winrash or what?
>
> We already discussed this problem some time ago. The conclusion was to instruct
> a tester to mark the service as interactive or run the tests manually.

Yeah, that's right!   Good thing you have a good memory when I come here 
whining.  :-)

Well, I tried now marking the service as interactive, but that didn't 
make any difference.

So, what follows, deprecate Winrash?


regards,
Jakob

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Jakob Eriksson" <jakov(a)vmlinux.org> wrote:
> Well, I tried now marking the service as interactive, but that didn't 
> make any difference.
>
> So, what follows, deprecate Winrash?

If it really breaks the tests then definitely yes.

-- 
Dmitry.