Re: [4] snmpapi: Implement SnmpUtil{DbgPrint, IdsToA, OidToA, PrintAsnAny, PrintOid}.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Hans Leidekker <hans(a)it.vu.nl> writes:
> +/***********************************************************************
> + *      SnmpUtilPrintOid        (SNMPAPI.@)
> + */
> +void WINAPI SnmpUtilPrintOid(AsnObjectIdentifier *oid)
> +{
> +    unsigned int i;
> +
> +    TRACE("(%p)\n", oid);
> +
> +    if (!oid) return;
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < oid->idLength; i++)
> +    {
> +        printf("%u", oid->ids[i]);
> +        if (i < oid->idLength - 1) printf(".");
> +    }
> +}

You don't want to use stdio functions in Wine. If apps really depend
on these functions you'd have to use msvcrt, but otherwise you can
simply use TRACE (or not implement them at all).

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org

[4] snmpapi: Implement SnmpUtil{DbgPrint, IdsToA, OidToA, PrintAsnAny, PrintOid}.

[Hans Leidekker]

On Monday 22 January 2007 12:49, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> You don't want to use stdio functions in Wine. If apps really depend
> on these functions you'd have to use msvcrt, but otherwise you can
> simply use TRACE (or not implement them at all).

What's the alternative for sprintf?

 -Hans

[4] snmpapi: Implement SnmpUtil{DbgPrint, IdsToA, OidToA, PrintAsnAny, PrintOid}.

[Kuba Ober]

On Monday 22 January 2007 08:13, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> On Monday 22 January 2007 12:49, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > You don't want to use stdio functions in Wine. If apps really depend
> > on these functions you'd have to use msvcrt, but otherwise you can
> > simply use TRACE (or not implement them at all).
>
> What's the alternative for sprintf?

Methinks you're free to use it if you use it safely (mind the buffer 
overflows).

Cheers, Kuba