Packagers: consider not packaging wine-1.1.12, or cherrypicking fixes
wine-1.1.12 has a couple regressions in it: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16754 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16732 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16708 Please consider either cherrypicking the fixes, or skipping wine-1.1.12.
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 10:11:23AM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
wine-1.1.12 has a couple regressions in it: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16754 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16732 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16708
Please consider either cherrypicking the fixes, or skipping wine-1.1.12.
I picked two fixes now, the third bug seems to be a dup of the debugger fix. d2c4ff23057c38547434d893272afd3e4e8a2b45 9087e5c55f35e091c5cb9ba381e0a5020d1fc0ad openSUSE 1.1.12 builds rebuilding right as we speak ;) Ciao, Marcus
Dan Kegel wrote:
wine-1.1.12 has a couple regressions in it: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16754 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16732 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16708
Please consider either cherrypicking the fixes, or skipping wine-1.1.12.
1.1.11 had a handful of regressions as well. Ironically for a game I play 1.1.12 fixed one introduced in 1.1.11. I have a theory that our releases have just as many regressions as before, we're just noticing them quicker due to our larger user base. Thanks, Scott Ritchie
participants (3)
-
Dan Kegel -
Marcus Meissner -
Scott Ritchie