Re: [Bug 3148] Mouse: multi-file "selection" & drag behavior broken
Looks like someone else is having this problem. I've tried looking at listview.c and the treeview equivalent as well, but I can't made heads or tails of it. I have no experience with C. Anybody on this list make any changes to listview or treeview in the last few months? Hiji
------- Additional Comments From qingdao33122(a)yahoo.com 2005-04-08 23:58 ------- About the same problem with AceFTP
Free download for trial
http://software.visicommedia.com/en/products/aceftpfreeware/
wine-20050524-1fc1winehq
Problem starts before I do the FTP thing. When I drag a file within the local pane(a listview), a copy of that file is immediately created. But things don't stop there. The moment I move the mouse a bit, AceFTP asks me with a popup menu if want to: Move to current location Copy to current location or Create a short If I choose to copy, ANOTHER copy of the file is created. After that, every time I move the mouse, AceFTP asks me again, thus an infinite loop and infinite number of copies of the same file.
BTW. I have to use native shell related dlls for AceFTP to display the local pane. So I suspect the problem is with the interaction between native and builtin code.
I hope my English is good enough for me to make some sense...
-- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Hi, On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 10:23:23PM -0700, Hiji wrote:
Looks like someone else is having this problem. I've tried looking at listview.c and the treeview equivalent as well, but I can't made heads or tails of it. I have no experience with C.
Anybody on this list make any changes to listview or treeview in the last few months? I wouldn't even find it hard to believe that they already forgot about it...
If you want hard, definitive data, then I I cannot find any reason why you wouldn't want to look at ChangeLog... Andreas Mohr
Anybody on this list make any changes to listview or treeview in the last few months? I wouldn't even find it hard to believe that they already forgot about it...
If you want hard, definitive data, then I I cannot find any reason why you wouldn't want to look at ChangeLog...
How about this: I didn't know about ChangeLog! LOL! I'm looking through it now... ;) Thanks! Hiji ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
--- Vitaly Lipatov <lav(a)etersoft.ru> wrote:
Hi, Can you pay attention to this patch? It really fixes the problem but not discussed in the list and not applied:
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/2005/08/0018.html WOOHOO! This fixes "half" the problem with Bug3148. Once I applied the patch, I no longer had the problem with the effect of the mouse button being continously pressed once I clicked on something. However, one problem still remains. If I select 3 items (shift + click from start item to finish item), and I click with the left-mouse, my selection is lost as now only 1 item is selected (the one I clicked on). However, if I right-click, my selection isn't lost. It seems what *should* happen is the following: 1. you make your selection in a listview (2+ items) by using the shiftkey + left-mouse button 2. let go of shiftkey and items are still selected 3. click on one of the highlighted items 4. selection remains intact 5. drag-drop as you wish However, things seem to go amiss at step 3. I can somewhat retain the selection if I keep the shift-key pressed throughout the process -- which is not the norm as I should let go at step 2.. So, can someone listen (pay attention) to Vitaly and apply the patch so at least this bug can get half-way fixed??? Thanks! Hiji --- Hiji <hijinio(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Anybody on this list make any changes to listview or treeview in the last few months? I wouldn't even find it hard to believe that they already forgot about it...
If you want hard, definitive data, then I I cannot find any reason why you wouldn't want to look at ChangeLog...
How about this: I didn't know about ChangeLog! LOL!
I'm looking through it now... ;)
Thanks! Hiji
____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
* On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Hiji wrote:
--- Vitaly Lipatov <lav(a)etersoft.ru> wrote:
Hi, Can you pay attention to this patch? It really fixes the problem but not discussed in the list and not applied:
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/2005/08/0018.html
WOOHOO! This fixes "half" the problem with Bug3148. Once I applied the patch, I no longer had the problem with the effect of the mouse button being continously pressed once I clicked on something. ... So, can someone listen (pay attention) to Vitaly and apply the patch so at least this bug can get half-way fixed???
The patch has 2 points to change (I am afraid): a, header of its first section refers to "sysparams.c" and "dlls/user/sysparams.c", which makes patcher to not find needed file (dlls/user/tests/sysparams.c). Command "cvs diff -pu dlls/user/" would do the job. :-P b, first hunk of the second section (dlls/user/sysparams.c) is already in the tree, so it fails too.
--- Saulius Krasuckas <saulius2(a)ar.fi.lt> wrote:
* On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Hiji wrote:
--- Vitaly Lipatov <lav(a)etersoft.ru> wrote:
Hi, Can you pay attention to this patch? It really fixes the problem but not discussed in the list and not applied:
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/2005/08/0018.html
WOOHOO! This fixes "half" the problem with
Bug3148.
Once I applied the patch, I no longer had the problem with the effect of the mouse button being continously pressed once I clicked on something. ... So, can someone listen (pay attention) to Vitaly and apply the patch so at least this bug can get half-way fixed???
The patch has 2 points to change (I am afraid):
a, header of its first section refers to "sysparams.c" and "dlls/user/sysparams.c", which makes patcher to not find needed file (dlls/user/tests/sysparams.c). Command "cvs diff -pu dlls/user/" would do the job. :-P
b, first hunk of the second section (dlls/user/sysparams.c) is already in the tree, so it fails too.
Ok, I had applied it to the July release, but if some changes are already in the tree, then that's good news. Vitaly, any thoughts on this? Hiji __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
* On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Hiji wrote:
--- Saulius Krasuckas <saulius2(a)ar.fi.lt> wrote:
a, header of its first section refers to "sysparams.c" and "dlls/user/sysparams.c", which makes patcher to not find needed file (dlls/user/tests/sysparams.c).
b, first hunk of the second section (dlls/user/sysparams.c) is already in the tree, so it fails too.
Ok, I had applied it to the July release, but if some changes are already in the tree, then that's good news.
Not very good, as the mentioned change is only cosmetic.
Vitaly, any thoughts on this?
If Vitaly is busy and won't object, I can resync his changes to the current CVS and send a patch from his name.
В сообщении от 24 Август 2005 22:14 Вы написали:
If Vitaly is busy and won't object, I can resync his changes to the current CVS and send a patch from his name. Well, I resent my patch again to wine-devel...
-- Vitaly Lipatov, ALT Linux Team Russia, Saint-Petersburg, www.etersoft.ru
--- Vitaly Lipatov <lav(a)etersoft.ru> wrote:
÷ ÓÏÏÂÝÅÎÉÉ ÏÔ 24 á×ÇÕÓÔ 2005 22:14 ÷Ù ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌÉ:
If Vitaly is busy and won't object, I can resync his changes to the current CVS and send a patch from his name. Well, I resent my patch again to wine-devel...
And the bug lives on in wine-20050830. Is this something I should not hope on ever getting fixed or having the patch merged into the tree? I think this is a REALLY serious bug. What good is Wine if mouse behavior is broken? :( Hiji ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
What do I do? I'm still seeing the same mouse misbehaviors in wine-20050930 as I have been seeing for the last few months. Vitaly, any idea whats going on? I'd be willing to email the app to anyone who is can help fix this. That way, you can compare this UI regression against that of wine-20041212. (It has a 30 day trial; so, there's no illegal stuff going on here.) Hiji __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com
participants (4)
-
Andreas Mohr -
Hiji -
Saulius Krasuckas -
Vitaly Lipatov