RE: [PATCH 1/2] user32: Use correct values to deselect combo box text with EM_SETSEL

[Hugh McMaster]

> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:42:13 +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> > Hugh McMaster wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/dlls/user32/combo.c b/dlls/user32/combo.c
> > > > > index c744ee5..4c57b72 100644
> > > > > --- a/dlls/user32/combo.c
> > > > > +++ b/dlls/user32/combo.c
> > > > > @@ -1189,6 +1189,8 @@ static void COMBO_KillFocus( LPHEADCOMBO lphc )
> > > > > {
> > > > > if( CB_GETTYPE(lphc) == CBS_DROPDOWNLIST )
> > > > > SendMessageW(lphc->hWndLBox, LB_CARETOFF, 0, 0);
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + SendMessageW(lphc->hWndEdit, EM_SETSEL, 0, 0);
> > > >
> > > > The message test doesn't confirm that this is a correct solution.
> > >
> > > I tested the sequence from WM_KILLFOCUS twice in dlls/user32/tests/msg.c.
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > In both sequences, the expected value of EM_SETSEL is 0, 0.
> > >
> > > Perhaps I'm not understanding what you mean in this case.
> >
> > I mean that adding a SendMessage() call should fix the message sequence
> > if that's how it's supposed to work, and as a result you would remove TRUE
> > as an indicator of todo_wine for fixed sequences.

I can't remove TRUE from those message tests yet, as the message sequence
fails. It seems some messages are not implemented or perhaps being
sent in the wrong order.

So, for SetFocusButtonSeq, the output is:
msg.c:6165: Test failed: SetFocus on a Button: 3: the msg 0x0202 was expected, but got msg 0x0111 instead

Is each message from the relevant sequence implemented in one file,
e.g. user32/combo.c, or are they spread into multiple files?

[PATCH 1/2] user32: Use correct values to deselect combo box text with EM_SETSEL

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

Hugh McMaster <hugh.mcmaster(a)outlook.com> wrote:
> > > > > > diff --git a/dlls/user32/combo.c b/dlls/user32/combo.c
> > > > > > index c744ee5..4c57b72 100644
> > > > > > --- a/dlls/user32/combo.c
> > > > > > +++ b/dlls/user32/combo.c
> > > > > > @@ -1189,6 +1189,8 @@ static void COMBO_KillFocus( LPHEADCOMBO lphc )
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > if( CB_GETTYPE(lphc) == CBS_DROPDOWNLIST )
> > > > > > SendMessageW(lphc->hWndLBox, LB_CARETOFF, 0, 0);
> > > > > > + else
> > > > > > + SendMessageW(lphc->hWndEdit, EM_SETSEL, 0, 0);
> > > > >
> > > > > The message test doesn't confirm that this is a correct solution.
> > > >
> > > > I tested the sequence from WM_KILLFOCUS twice in dlls/user32/tests/msg.c.
> > > >
> > > > [snip]
> > > >
> > > > In both sequences, the expected value of EM_SETSEL is 0, 0.
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps I'm not understanding what you mean in this case.
> > >
> > > I mean that adding a SendMessage() call should fix the message sequence
> > > if that's how it's supposed to work, and as a result you would remove TRUE
> > > as an indicator of todo_wine for fixed sequences.
>
> I can't remove TRUE from those message tests yet, as the message sequence
> fails. It seems some messages are not implemented or perhaps being
> sent in the wrong order.

I would suggest to fix those failures first to make the patch look much
more convincing.
> So, for SetFocusButtonSeq, the output is:
> msg.c:6165: Test failed: SetFocus on a Button: 3: the msg 0x0202 was expected, but got msg 0x0111 instead
>
> Is each message from the relevant sequence implemented in one file,
> e.g. user32/combo.c, or are they spread into multiple files?

Sent messages depend on performed actions, and may be sent from
different places.

-- 
Dmitry.