Re: gdi32/tests/mapping: remove win9x hacks
Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote:
- if (is_win9x) - { - expect_viewport_ext(hdc, dpi_x, dpi_y); - expect_window_ext(hdc, 254, -254); - } - else - { - expect_viewport_ext(hdc, res_x, -res_y); - ok( GetWindowExtEx( hdc, &size ), "GetWindowExtEx failed\n" ); - ok( rough_match( size.cx, size_cx * 10 ) || - rough_match( size.cx, MulDiv( res_x, 254, dpi_x )), /* Vista uses a more precise method */ - "expected cx %d or %d, got %d\n", size_cx * 10, MulDiv( res_x, 254, dpi_x ), size.cx ); - ok( rough_match( size.cy, size_cy * 10 ) || - rough_match( size.cy, MulDiv( res_y, 254, dpi_y )), /* Vista uses a more precise method */ - "expected cy %d or %d, got %d\n", size_cy * 10, MulDiv( res_y, 254, dpi_y ), size.cy ); - } + ok( GetWindowExtEx( hdc, &size ), "GetWindowExtEx failed\n" ); + ok( rough_match( size.cx, size_cx * 10 ) || + rough_match( size.cx, MulDiv( res_x, 254, dpi_x )), /* Vista uses a more precise method */ + "expected cx %d or %d, got %d\n", size_cx * 10, MulDiv( res_x, 254, dpi_x ), size.cx ); + ok( rough_match( size.cy, size_cy * 10 ) || + rough_match( size.cy, MulDiv( res_y, 254, dpi_y )), /* Vista uses a more precise method */ + "expected cy %d or %d, got %d\n", size_cy * 10, MulDiv( res_y, 254, dpi_y ), size.cy ); expect_world_transform(hdc, 1.0, 1.0); expect_LPtoDP(hdc, MulDiv(1000 / 10, res_x, size_cx), -MulDiv(1000 / 10, res_y, size_cy));
You've lost 'expect_viewport_ext(hdc, res_x, -res_y);' from the 'else' block. -- Dmitry.
participants (1)
-
Dmitry Timoshkov