Re: KERNEL: [2/2] changed test for FindFirstFileEx (Edited)
Monday, April 24, 2006, 2:23:31 AM, Konstantin Petrov wrote:
(Patch edited) There were the problem while I advert to dosdevices through WINE. I made the test (Windows vs Wine), which shows that in Windows there are available dosfiles (such as NUL, COM1, COM2,.., LPT1, ..), and in Wine aren't. The characteristic property of these files is that I can advert to them only directly. In other cases they are invisible.
patch for test
changelog tests/file.c: added test of FindFirstFileA to check correct handling of advertments to dosdevices.
May I ask why such complication? Isn't it easier to create all those COM LPT, NUL, etc in ~/.wine/dosdevices? That seems to be a better way to handle this, because that some-what close to how native does it. Btw that also will clear all the questions where COM and LPT ports point to. Vitaliy Margolen
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Monday, April 24, 2006, 2:23:31 AM, Konstantin Petrov wrote:
(Patch edited) There were the problem while I advert to dosdevices through WINE. I made the test (Windows vs Wine), which shows that in Windows there are available dosfiles (such as NUL, COM1, COM2,.., LPT1, ..), and in Wine aren't. The characteristic property of these files is that I can advert to them only directly. In other cases they are invisible.
patch for test
changelog tests/file.c: added test of FindFirstFileA to check correct handling of advertments to dosdevices.
May I ask why such complication? Isn't it easier to create all those COM LPT, NUL, etc in ~/.wine/dosdevices?
That seems to be a better way to handle this, because that some-what close to how native does it. I don't the point, as what the patch implement is to make visible, in every directory, the dos devices' names, and any creation in dosdevices won't solve this particular point. A+
-- Eric Pouech
participants (2)
-
Eric Pouech -
Vitaliy Margolen