Re: Remove redundant implementations

[Alexandre Julliard]

Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> writes:
> Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com>
>     Remove redundant implementation of __get_cs,__get_ds,__get_es,
>     __get_fs,__get_gs,__get_ss,__set_fs,__set_gs.

These are here to support compilers that don't have gcc-style inline
assembly. This is admittedly a theoretical issue at this point, but
there shouldn't be any harm in keeping them around just in case.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.com

Remove redundant implementations

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Alexandre Julliard" <julliard(a)winehq.com> wrote:
> > Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com>
> >     Remove redundant implementation of __get_cs,__get_ds,__get_es,
> >     __get_fs,__get_gs,__get_ss,__set_fs,__set_gs.
>
> These are here to support compilers that don't have gcc-style inline
> assembly. This is admittedly a theoretical issue at this point, but
> there shouldn't be any harm in keeping them around just in case.

Perhaps they should be protected from compiling under gcc?
--
Dmitry.