Re: cabinet/tests: Reformated output in case of test failure (try 3)

[Alexandre Julliard]

Marko Nikolic <grkoma(a)gmail.com> writes:
> @@ -109,9 +109,9 @@ static void test_FDICreate(void)
>          ok(hfdi != NULL, "Expected non-NULL context\n");
>          ok(GetLastError() == 0xdeadbeef,
>             "Expected 0xdeadbeef, got %d\n", GetLastError());
> -        ok(erf.erfOper == 0x1abe11ed, "Expected 0x1abe11ed, got %d\n", erf.erfOper);
> -        ok(erf.erfType == 0x5eed1e55, "Expected 0x5eed1e55, got %d\n", erf.erfType);
> -        ok(erf.fError == 0x1ead1e55, "Expected 0x1ead1e55, got %d\n", erf.fError);
> +        ok(erf.erfOper == 0x1abe11ed, "Expected 0x1abe11ed, got %x\n", erf.erfOper);
> +        ok(erf.erfType == 0x5eed1e55, "Expected 0x5eed1e55, got %x\n", erf.erfType);
> +        ok(erf.fError == 0x1ead1e55, "Expected 0x1ead1e55, got %x\n", erf.fError);

Most of these are error codes too, they should be in decimal. I don't
see why you want to change this at all. If you think having the expected
value printed in hex is confusing just get rid of it, it's useless
anyway.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org