[PATCH] wlanapi/tests: Spelling fixes in ok() messages.

[Francois Gouget]

Signed-off-by: Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr>
---
 dlls/wlanapi/tests/wlanapi.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dlls/wlanapi/tests/wlanapi.c b/dlls/wlanapi/tests/wlanapi.c
index cab5cf62fbf..55ac21eee04 100644
--- a/dlls/wlanapi/tests/wlanapi.c
+++ b/dlls/wlanapi/tests/wlanapi.c
@@ -36,17 +36,17 @@ static void test_WlanOpenHandle(void)
     if (!is_xp) /* the results in XP differ completely from all other versions */
     {
         ok(ret == ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED, "Expected 50, got %d\n", ret);
-        ok(neg_version == 0xdeadbeef, "neg_vesion changed\n");
+        ok(neg_version == 0xdeadbeef, "neg_version changed\n");
         ok(handle == bad_handle, "handle changed\n");
         ret = WlanOpenHandle(10, NULL, &neg_version, &handle);
         ok(ret == ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED, "Expected 50, got %d\n", ret);
-        ok(neg_version == 0xdeadbeef, "neg_vesion changed\n");
+        ok(neg_version == 0xdeadbeef, "neg_version changed\n");
         ok(handle == bad_handle, "handle changed\n");
 
         /* reserved parameter must not be used */
         ret = WlanOpenHandle(1, &reserved, &neg_version, &handle);
         ok(ret == ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER, "Expected 87, got %d\n", ret);
-        ok(neg_version == 0xdeadbeef, "neg_vesion changed\n");
+        ok(neg_version == 0xdeadbeef, "neg_version changed\n");
         ok(handle == bad_handle, "handle changed\n");
 
         /* invalid parameters */
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static void test_WlanOpenHandle(void)
         ok(handle == bad_handle, "bad handle\n");
         ret = WlanOpenHandle(1, NULL, &neg_version, NULL);
         ok(ret == ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER, "Expected 87, got %d\n", ret);
-        ok(neg_version == 0xdeadbeef, "neg_vesion changed\n");
+        ok(neg_version == 0xdeadbeef, "neg_version changed\n");
     }
     else
     {
-- 
2.20.1

[Marvin]

Hi,

While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?

Full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=55300

Your paranoid android.


=== wvistau64 (64 bit report) ===

wlanapi:
wlanapi: Timeout

=== w7pro64 (64 bit report) ===

wlanapi:
wlanapi: Timeout

=== w864 (64 bit report) ===

wlanapi:
wlanapi: Timeout

=== w1064v1507 (64 bit report) ===

wlanapi:
wlanapi: Timeout

=== w1064v1809 (64 bit report) ===

wlanapi:
wlanapi: Timeout