winedbg unimplemented function broken

[Andreas Mohr]

Hi all,

I just had:

Unhandled exception: unimplemented function kernel32.dll.GetDaylightFlag called in 32-bit code (0x4086f052).
In 32-bit mode.
0x4086f052 (__wine_unimplemented+0x52 [kernel32.spec.c:42] in kernel32.dll.so): jmp     0x4086f04c (__wine_unimplemented+0x4c [kernel32.spec.c:42] in kernel32.dll.so)
50      void __wine_stub_kernel32_dll_19(void) { __wine_unimplemented("ThunkTheTemplateHandle"); }


since this is called from applet TIMEDATE.CPL, I assume it's NOT
ThunkTheTemplateHandle().
In other words, we've got a function lookup problem.
I've also had wrong information in one other case.
Breakage from recent ntdll loader work?

-- 
Andreas Mohr                        Stauferstr. 6, D-71272 Renningen, Germany
Tel. [phone]                http://mohr.de.tt

[Alexandre Julliard]

Andreas Mohr <andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> writes:
> I just had:
>
> Unhandled exception: unimplemented function kernel32.dll.GetDaylightFlag called in 32-bit code (0x4086f052).
> In 32-bit mode.
> 0x4086f052 (__wine_unimplemented+0x52 [kernel32.spec.c:42] in kernel32.dll.so): jmp     0x4086f04c (__wine_unimplemented+0x4c [kernel32.spec.c:42] in kernel32.dll.so)
> 50      void __wine_stub_kernel32_dll_19(void) { __wine_unimplemented("ThunkTheTemplateHandle"); }
>
> since this is called from applet TIMEDATE.CPL, I assume it's NOT
> ThunkTheTemplateHandle().

No, it's another function (hint: read the error message).
> In other words, we've got a function lookup problem.

No we don't. The debugger is probably a bit confused by the missing
function epilog in __wine_unimplemented and so displays the next line
of code instead; that's no big deal.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.com

[Andreas Mohr]

On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 05:07:14PM -0700, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Andreas Mohr <andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> writes:
> > I just had:
> >
> > Unhandled exception: unimplemented function kernel32.dll.GetDaylightFlag called in 32-bit code (0x4086f052).
> > In 32-bit mode.
> > 0x4086f052 (__wine_unimplemented+0x52 [kernel32.spec.c:42] in kernel32.dll.so): jmp     0x4086f04c (__wine_unimplemented+0x4c [kernel32.spec.c:42] in kernel32.dll.so)
> > 50      void __wine_stub_kernel32_dll_19(void) { __wine_unimplemented("ThunkTheTemplateHandle"); }
> >
> > since this is called from applet TIMEDATE.CPL, I assume it's NOT
> > ThunkTheTemplateHandle().
>
> No, it's another function (hint: read the error message).
> Yep, I did; I said that because of that I assume it's NOT
> ThunkTheTemplateHandle ;-)
> > In other words, we've got a function lookup problem.
>
> No we don't. The debugger is probably a bit confused by the missing
> function epilog in __wine_unimplemented and so displays the next line
> of code instead; that's no big deal.
> Ah, thanks!
> Hmm, I'm afraid that this will confuse some more people... and thus
> maybe produce some more ignorant questions ;)
> Thus it'd be nice if this "cosmetic issue" could be fixed or worked
> around very easily somehow.

Andreas Mohr

[Eric Pouech]

> Ah, thanks!
> Hmm, I'm afraid that this will confuse some more people... and thus
> maybe produce some more ignorant questions ;)
> Thus it'd be nice if this "cosmetic issue" could be fixed or worked
> around very easily somehow.
> it also depends from the stabs generated by gcc
> I get a different line here (basically the #if __GNUC__) which is wrong too

A+
-- 
Eric Pouech