Re: [3/3] user32: Change value for WM_MDICALCCHILDSCROLL to 0x003f.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> writes:
> This appears to be what Windows uses.

Is there an app where this makes a difference, or is it just because of
the test?

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org

[3/3] user32: Change value for WM_MDICALCCHILDSCROLL to 0x003f.

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
> > This appears to be what Windows uses.
>
> Is there an app where this makes a difference, or is it just because of
> the test?

That's what I've found with the test, nothing depends on it, and the patch
could be safely ignored if desired.

-- 
Dmitry.

[3/3] user32: Change value for WM_MDICALCCHILDSCROLL to 0x003f.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> writes:
> Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
> > > This appears to be what Windows uses.
> >
> > Is there an app where this makes a difference, or is it just because of
> > the test?
>
> That's what I've found with the test, nothing depends on it, and the patch
> could be safely ignored if desired.

OK, thanks. It looks fine, but if nothing depends on it, I prefer that
we wait until after code freeze.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org