Re: [7/7] ws2_32: Better trace setsockopt/getsockopt (try 2)

[Alexandre Julliard]

Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> writes:
> Use wine_dbg_sprintf instead of plain sprintf, that simplified the patch =)

What you really want is to implement a debugstr_sockopt and something
like a debugstr_optval and use these in normal TRACE statements, instead
of hiding the trace inside a helper function. Also you can't append to a
wine_dbg_sprintf string, that's why it's const...

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org