Re: msvcrt: Implemented wcscpy_s (try 2)
Hi, Is there any thing wrong with this patch? Best Regards Alistair Leslie-Hughes "Alistair Leslie-Hughes" <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:fpljui$nsa$1(a)ger.gmane.org...
Hi, Correct msvcrt.spec file
Changelog: msvcrt: Implemented wcscpy_s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From 6860771cc3fc06b3da63f7c674daf71861593ef3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:48:01 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] Implemented wcscpy_s
--- dlls/msvcrt/msvcrt.spec | 1 + dlls/msvcrt/tests/string.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ dlls/msvcrt/wcs.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/msvcrt/msvcrt.spec b/dlls/msvcrt/msvcrt.spec index d6cffcb..7b821e6 100644 --- a/dlls/msvcrt/msvcrt.spec +++ b/dlls/msvcrt/msvcrt.spec @@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ @ cdecl wcscmp(wstr wstr) ntdll.wcscmp @ cdecl wcscoll(wstr wstr) MSVCRT_wcscoll @ cdecl wcscpy(ptr wstr) ntdll.wcscpy +@ cdecl wcscpy_s(ptr long wstr) MSVCRT_wcscpy_s @ cdecl wcscspn(wstr wstr) ntdll.wcscspn @ cdecl wcsftime(ptr long wstr ptr) MSVCRT_wcsftime @ cdecl wcslen(wstr) ntdll.wcslen diff --git a/dlls/msvcrt/tests/string.c b/dlls/msvcrt/tests/string.c index c6dcd34..b09d204 100644 --- a/dlls/msvcrt/tests/string.c +++ b/dlls/msvcrt/tests/string.c @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static int* (*pmemcmp)(void *, const void *, size_t n); static int (*pstrcpy_s)(char *dst, size_t len, const char *src); static int (*pstrcat_s)(char *dst, size_t len, const char *src); static int (*p_mbsnbcpy_s)(unsigned char * dst, size_t size, const unsigned char * src, size_t count); +static int (*p_wcscpy_s)(wchar_t *wcDest, size_t size, const wchar_t *wcSrc);
#define SETNOFAIL(x,y) x = (void*)GetProcAddress(hMsvcrt,y) #define SET(x,y) SETNOFAIL(x,y); ok(x != NULL, "Export '%s' not found\n", y) @@ -562,6 +563,47 @@ static void test__mbsnbcpy_s(void) dest[0], dest[1], dest[2], dest[3], dest[4], dest[5], dest[6], dest[7]); }
+static void test_wcscpy_s(void) +{ + static const WCHAR szLongText[] = { 'T','h','i','s','A','L','o','n','g','s','t','r','i','n','g',0 }; + static WCHAR szDest[18]; + static WCHAR szDestShort[8]; + int ret; + + if(!p_wcscpy_s) + { + skip("wcscpy_s not found\n"); + return; + } + + /* Test NULL Dest */ + ret = p_wcscpy_s(NULL, 16, szLongText); + ok(ret == EINVAL, "p_wcscpy_s expect EINVAL got %d\n", ret); + + /* Test NULL Source */ + szDest[0] = 'A'; + ret = p_wcscpy_s(szDest, 16, NULL); + ok(ret == EINVAL, "expected EINVAL got %d\n", ret); + ok(szDest[0] == 0, "szDest[0] not 0\n"); + + /* Test invalid size */ + szDest[0] = 'A'; + ret = p_wcscpy_s(szDest, 0, szLongText); + ok(ret == EINVAL, "expected ERANGE got %d\n", ret); + ok(szDest[0] == 0, "szDest[0] not 0\n"); + + /* Copy same buffer size */ + ret = p_wcscpy_s(szDest, 18, szLongText); + ok(ret == 0, "expected 0 got %d\n", ret); + ok(lstrcmpW(szDest, szLongText) == 0, "szDest != szLongText\n"); + + /* Copy smaller buffer size */ + szDest[0] = 'A'; + ret = p_wcscpy_s(szDestShort, 8, szLongText); + ok(ret == ERANGE, "expected EINVAL got %d\n", ret); + ok(szDestShort[0] == 0, "szDest[0] not 0\n"); +} + START_TEST(string) { char mem[100]; @@ -577,6 +619,7 @@ START_TEST(string) SET(pstrcpy_s,"strcpy_s"); SET(pstrcat_s,"strcat_s"); SET(p_mbsnbcpy_s,"_mbsnbcpy_s"); + SET(p_wcscpy_s,"wcscpy_s");
/* MSVCRT memcpy behaves like memmove for overlapping moves, MFC42 CString::Insert seems to rely on that behaviour */ @@ -599,4 +642,6 @@ START_TEST(string) test_strcpy_s(); test_strcat_s(); test__mbsnbcpy_s(); + + test_wcscpy_s(); } diff --git a/dlls/msvcrt/wcs.c b/dlls/msvcrt/wcs.c index 92dd644..66b8907 100644 --- a/dlls/msvcrt/wcs.c +++ b/dlls/msvcrt/wcs.c @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ #include "wine/unicode.h" #include "wine/debug.h"
+#include <msvcrt/errno.h> + WINE_DEFAULT_DEBUG_CHANNEL(msvcrt);
@@ -971,3 +973,46 @@ INT CDECL MSVCRT_iswxdigit( MSVCRT_wchar_t wc ) { return isxdigitW( wc ); } + +/********************************************************************* + * wcscpy_s (MSVCRT.@) + */ +INT CDECL MSVCRT_wcscpy_s( MSVCRT_wchar_t* wcDest, size_t numElement, const MSVCRT_wchar_t *wcSrc) +{ + int size = 0; + + if(!wcDest) + return EINVAL; + + if(!wcSrc) + { + wcDest[0] = 0; + return EINVAL; + } + + if(numElement <= 0) + { + wcDest[0] = 0; + + if(numElement < 0) + return ERANGE; + else + return EINVAL; + } + + size = strlenW(wcSrc) + 1; + + if(size > numElement) + { + wcDest[0] = 0; + return ERANGE; + } + + if(size > numElement) + size = numElement; + + memcpy( wcDest, wcSrc, size*sizeof(WCHAR) ); + + return 0; +} + -- 1.5.4.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Alistair Leslie-Hughes" <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> writes:
Is there any thing wrong with this patch?
+ /* Test invalid size */ + szDest[0] = 'A'; + ret = p_wcscpy_s(szDest, 0, szLongText); + ok(ret == EINVAL, "expected ERANGE got %d\n", ret); + ok(szDest[0] == 0, "szDest[0] not 0\n"); + + /* Copy same buffer size */ + ret = p_wcscpy_s(szDest, 18, szLongText); + ok(ret == 0, "expected 0 got %d\n", ret); + ok(lstrcmpW(szDest, szLongText) == 0, "szDest != szLongText\n"); + + /* Copy smaller buffer size */ + szDest[0] = 'A'; + ret = p_wcscpy_s(szDestShort, 8, szLongText); + ok(ret == ERANGE, "expected EINVAL got %d\n", ret); + ok(szDestShort[0] == 0, "szDest[0] not 0\n");
The error messages don't match the tests.
+ if(numElement <= 0) + { + wcDest[0] = 0; + + if(numElement < 0) + return ERANGE; + else + return EINVAL;
The variable is unsigned so the comparison is useless. Also its type should be MSVCRT_size_t. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
participants (2)
-
Alexandre Julliard -
Alistair Leslie-Hughes