Re: Prepare the unicodification of advpack.dll
On 2/24/06, Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> wrote:
All functions that manipulate strings should have an Ansi and a Unicode variant.
Does it matter that native advpack only has Ansi functions? I think we should leave it the way it is, because any application that uses advpack will only know of Ansi API and adding unicode handling adds more complexity and chances for error. -- James Hawkins
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, James Hawkins wrote:
On 2/24/06, Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> wrote:
All functions that manipulate strings should have an Ansi and a Unicode variant.
Does it matter that native advpack only has Ansi functions?
That's changing in the latest Windows PSDK. Hence the patch... -- Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/ I haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on tape around here somewhere...
On 2/24/06, Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, James Hawkins wrote:
On 2/24/06, Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> wrote:
All functions that manipulate strings should have an Ansi and a Unicode variant.
Does it matter that native advpack only has Ansi functions?
That's changing in the latest Windows PSDK. Hence the patch...
Ah darn, more converting work to add to the list. -- James Hawkins
participants (2)
-
Francois Gouget -
James Hawkins