Windows XP conformance test update 1/5

[David Miller]

Not much to report this time but there is something... strange.

kernel32/drive reported the following.

C:\winetests>kernel32_test.exe drive
drive.c:113: Test failed: GetDiskFreeSpaceA(Z:\): ret=0 GetLastError=53
drive.c:165: Test failed: GetDiskFreeSpaceW(Z): ret=0 GetLastError=53
drive: 156 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 2 failures.

Previously this test passed, so I rebooted to see if the problem went 
away.  After reboot the kernel32 test clamed not to be a valid win32 
application.  Turns out the size was 0 bytes.  I re-extracted the zip file 
and ran kernel32/drive again.  This time is passed.  I have not seen the 
failure before but I did run into the "not a valid win32 application" 
message before, and the file size was 0 bytes.  Normally I would suspect a 
virus to produce that sort of problem, but I've only seen this happen to 
the kernel32_test.exe file.  I will attempt to find out if it can be 
reproduced and how.  I have an XP laptop as well so I'll try to verify it 
is not a system specific problem.

oleaut32/safearray reports 8 failures but the page only shows 4 failures.

C:\winetests>oleaut32_test.exe safearray
safearray.c:137: Test failed: SAC(20,1,[1,0]), result 8, expected 0
safearray.c:143: Test failed: SAGE for vt 20 returned elemsize 8 instead of 
expected 0
safearray.c:159: Test failed: copy of SAC(20,1,[1,0]), result 8, expected 0
safearray.c:162: Test failed: SAGE for vt 20 returned elemsize 8 instead of 
expected 0
safearray.c:137: Test failed: SAC(21,1,[1,0]), result 8, expected 0
safearray.c:143: Test failed: SAGE for vt 21 returned elemsize 8 instead of 
expected 0
safearray.c:159: Test failed: copy of SAC(21,1,[1,0]), result 8, expected 0
safearray.c:162: Test failed: SAGE for vt 21 returned elemsize 8 instead of 
expected 0
safearray: 958 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 8 failures.

Also I don't see urlmon/generated on the status page at all.  It passed.

C:\winetests>urlmon_test.exe generated
generated: 4 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures.

[Francois Gouget]

On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, David Miller wrote:
> Not much to report this time but there is something... strange.
>
> kernel32/drive reported the following.
> [...]
> Previously this test passed, so I rebooted to see if the problem went
> away.  After reboot the kernel32 test clamed not to be a valid win32
> application.  Turns out the size was 0 bytes.  I re-extracted the zip file
> and ran kernel32/drive again.  This time is passed.  I have not seen the
> failure before but I did run into the "not a valid win32 application"
> message before, and the file size was 0 bytes.

Yes, that's pretty strange. I don't see what could cause this problem.
> oleaut32/safearray reports 8 failures but the page only shows 4 failures.
> [...]
> Also I don't see urlmon/generated on the status page at all.  It passed.
>
> C:\winetests>urlmon_test.exe generated
> generated: 4 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures.

Thanks, I updated the page.


-- 
Francois Gouget         fgouget(a)free.fr        http://fgouget.free.fr/
    I haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on tape around here somewhere...

[Dave]

Well, whatever the problem I can't get my XP laptop to do it.  It could be 
something goofy with this one system.  I'll do future tests on my laptop 
and avoid the problem.  :)

At 12:30 AM 1/5/2003 -0800, you wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, David Miller wrote:
> > Not much to report this time but there is something... strange.
> >
> > kernel32/drive reported the following.
> > [...]
> > Previously this test passed, so I rebooted to see if the problem went
> > away.  After reboot the kernel32 test clamed not to be a valid win32
> > application.  Turns out the size was 0 bytes.  I re-extracted the zip file
> > and ran kernel32/drive again.  This time is passed.  I have not seen the
> > failure before but I did run into the "not a valid win32 application"
> > message before, and the file size was 0 bytes.
>
> Yes, that's pretty strange. I don't see what could cause this problem.
> > oleaut32/safearray reports 8 failures but the page only shows 4 failures.
> > [...]
> > Also I don't see urlmon/generated on the status page at all.  It passed.
> >
> > C:\winetests>urlmon_test.exe generated
> > generated: 4 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures.
>
> Thanks, I updated the page.
>
> --
> Francois Gouget         fgouget(a)free.fr        http://fgouget.free.fr/
>     I haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on tape around here somewhere...

[Marcus Meissner]

> oleaut32/safearray reports 8 failures but the page only shows 4 failures.

Simple, I did update these tests after your last run.
> C:\winetests>oleaut32_test.exe safearray
> safearray.c:137: Test failed: SAC(20,1,[1,0]), result 8, expected 0
> safearray.c:143: Test failed: SAGE for vt 20 returned elemsize 8 instead of 
> expected 0
> safearray.c:159: Test failed: copy of SAC(20,1,[1,0]), result 8, expected 0
> safearray.c:162: Test failed: SAGE for vt 20 returned elemsize 8 instead of 
> expected 0
> safearray.c:137: Test failed: SAC(21,1,[1,0]), result 8, expected 0
> safearray.c:143: Test failed: SAGE for vt 21 returned elemsize 8 instead of 
> expected 0
> safearray.c:159: Test failed: copy of SAC(21,1,[1,0]), result 8, expected 0
> safearray.c:162: Test failed: SAGE for vt 21 returned elemsize 8 instead of 
> expected 0
> safearray: 958 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 8 failures.

But these are still the same failures, just twice now.

Ciao, Marcus