xfs getting case-insensitive filesystem support...

[Dan Kegel]

Hrm.  This is interesting:
  http://lwn.net/Articles/278961/
I wonder if Wine could run faster if it could delegate
the case-insensitvity to the filesystem...

[Joerg Mayer]

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 08:39:40PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Hrm.  This is interesting:
>   http://lwn.net/Articles/278961/
> I wonder if Wine could run faster if it could delegate
> the case-insensitvity to the filesystem...

Would be nice indeed, but I don't think it will come: Linus shot down
similar patches in the past because to_lower may be easy to implement
for ascii, but once you want to implement it for all charsets supported
by the files system it gets very messy.

 Ciao
     Joerg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer(a)loplof.de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Joerg Mayer" <jmayer(a)loplof.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 08:39:40PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Hrm.  This is interesting:
> >   http://lwn.net/Articles/278961/
> > I wonder if Wine could run faster if it could delegate
> > the case-insensitvity to the filesystem...
>
> Would be nice indeed, but I don't think it will come: Linus shot down
> similar patches in the past because to_lower may be easy to implement
> for ascii, but once you want to implement it for all charsets supported
> by the files system it gets very messy.

Sure, it's messy until the filesystem is unicode internally, and uses
something more reasonable instead of a multibyte UTF-8.

-- 
Dmitry.

[David Laight]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 03:05:51PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Joerg Mayer" <jmayer(a)loplof.de> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 08:39:40PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > > Hrm.  This is interesting:
> > >   http://lwn.net/Articles/278961/
> > > I wonder if Wine could run faster if it could delegate
> > > the case-insensitvity to the filesystem...
> >
> > Would be nice indeed, but I don't think it will come: Linus shot down
> > similar patches in the past because to_lower may be easy to implement
> > for ascii, but once you want to implement it for all charsets supported
> > by the files system it gets very messy.
>
> Sure, it's messy until the filesystem is unicode internally, and uses
> something more reasonable instead of a multibyte UTF-8.

Unix filesystems treat filenames as byte-strings, this is 100% reasonable :-)
Any conversion to glygps isn't a filesyatem operation.

	David

-- 
David Laight: david(a)l8s.co.uk