2 Sep
2025
2 Sep
'25
1:13 p.m.
I suggested using `raise(SIGQUIT)` instead of e.g., refactoring all uninterrupted sections.
Well, idk IMO it's easier to follow with an explicit return code handling rather than asynchronous signal processing, but I don't care much. I don't know what the argument was against !4811 but I think this would now be nice to have fixed or at least improved enough for the kernel32:sync test failure to avoid blocking !8875. -- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/8878#note_114524