Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] MR9305: Reject pseudo-handles in NtWaitForMultipleObjects().

[Marc-Aurel Zent (＠mzent)]

On Wed Oct 29 22:28:44 2025 +0000, Paul Gofman wrote:
> Ah yeah, sorry, indeed. Yet once we are going to do weird things with
> handles it would probably make sense to test something around std
> handles. If WaitForMultiple and WaitForSingle behaves different WRT
> pseudo-handles, is it the same for std handles?
> For std handles, it seems to be exactly the same (also part of the tests now).

-- 
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/9305#note_120140