12 Dec
2023
12 Dec
'23
10:44 p.m.
On Tue Dec 12 22:44:57 2023 +0000, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
When this happens, it can be received within the small range of instructions where %fs has been restored but we have not yet switched to the syscall stack, or the other way around in the return path. Is there a reason that we can't do these things in the right order then? It might not be possible to restore %fs *after* switching to the user stack as some of the return paths use `iret` to do that?
-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/4683#note_55860