25 Feb
2026
25 Feb
'26
5:52 p.m.
On Wed Feb 25 17:39:43 2026 +0000, Christopher Denton wrote:
Just to clarify something, would you agree that emitting an `ERR` here makes sense? Even for ERR I'd also think a formally better place for that would be ntdll/unix/system.c:read_dev_urandom() (after checking that read to the requested size actually succeeded). But yet I am still failing to see how that changes anything in practice, the code is not supposed to fail there as well. Maybe assert( ret == len ) in the end of the function (with appropriate move ret definition) would make some sense.
-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/10174#note_130509