29 Apr
2025
29 Apr
'25
2:39 p.m.
On Tue Apr 29 14:39:42 2025 +0000, Rémi Bernon wrote:
How about allocating and using only one array of HANDLE instead of having to handle allocation failures twice? sizeof(HANDLE) >= sizeof(obj_handle_t) so you can fill it with obj_handle_t and fix them up before waiting by moving them inline backwards. I had thought of something along those lines but I was unsure if it was appropriate. Done now :slight_smile:
-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/7797#note_102149