Jacek Caban (@jacek) commented about dlls/jscript/tests/lang.js:
+ ok(get_a() === 2, "function(a, a, b, c) get_a() = " + get_a()); + ok(a === 2, "function(a, a, b, c) a = " + a); + ok(b === 3, "function(a, a, b, c) b = " + b); + ok(c === 4, "function(a, a, b, c) c = " + c); + a = 42; + ok(arguments[0] === 1, "function(a, a, b, c) arguments[0] = " + arguments[0]); + ok(arguments[1] === 42, "function(a, a, b, c) arguments[1] = " + arguments[1]); + ok(get_a() === 42, "function(a, a, b, c) get_a() = " + get_a() + " expected 42"); + args = arguments; + })(1, 2, 3, 4); + + ok(get_a() === 42, "function(a, a, b, c) get_a() after detach = " + get_a()); + set_a(100); + ok(get_a() === 100, "function(a, a, b, c) get_a() = " + get_a() + " expected 100"); + ok(args[0] === 1, "function(a, a, b, c) detached args[0] = " + args[0]); + ok(args[1] === 42, "function(a, a, b, c) detached args[1] = " + args[1]); This test does not work in MSHTML and, as expected, uses 100 here. This looks more like a bug in jscript.dll than anything intended, so maybe we could just implement the MSHTML behavior.
I was surprised that you still need a separated buffer in arguments object and it won't work for the proper implementation. -- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/2942#note_36096