16 Oct
2022
16 Oct
'22
1:10 p.m.
On Sat Oct 15 16:54:24 2022 +0000, Fabian Maurer wrote:
Are you sure it works exactly like that in gdi32 as well? We don't seem to have tests for that, and I don't feel comfortable just removing the recursive call. I mean there's probably a reason it was done like this... Anyways, I just wanted to fix a stackoverflow, didn't expect to rewrite the logic for glyph lookup. Should I really change that with the superficial knowledge I have? I don't know what you should do, I'm just pointing out why I think this change is conceptually not looking right.
-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/1055#note_10858