31 May
2023
31 May
'23
1:54 a.m.
On Wed May 31 01:49:23 2023 +0000, Ziqing Hui wrote:
What I think is add something like wg_unknown(I not sure that its name should be) to wingstreamer which represent the muxer component. Then we have 3 components in winegstreamer: 1. wg_parser to demux and decode. 2. wg_transform to decode and encode. 3. wg_unknown to mux (and maybe encode). Now, the question is: should wg_unknown contain encoding pipeline like wg_parser who contains decoding pipeline? If do, it behaves like a opposite of wg_parser, then maybe we could make use of encodebin plugin? If not, it only does mux stuff. From my perspective, I prefer to have a individual muxer component.
-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/2910#note_34179