11 Oct
2023
11 Oct
'23
5:17 p.m.
Oh I see now, Henri specifically requested the opposite.
I don't know if it's exactly the opposite, but if we're going to have "notimpl", I think that should have a consistent meaning across backends, yes. We could certainly decide that we don't care to distinguish between E_NOTIMPL and E_FAIL in general though, and just check for "FAILED(hr)" for "fail", but that seems like a change somewhat orthogonal to this MR. -- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/vkd3d/-/merge_requests/346#note_48379