19 Mar
2024
19 Mar
'24
1:21 p.m.
On Tue Mar 19 13:12:32 2024 +0000, Gijs Vermeulen wrote:
If we're "breaking consistency" anyway, wouldn't it make more sense to just return the correct value for this class? My impression is that `STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION` is not necessarily something you'll return after explicit check, it might come from syscall exception handling. That means that after winxp there is an invalid handle check that wasn't there before.
-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5269#note_65332