14 May
2025
14 May
'25
9:10 a.m.
On Wed May 14 09:03:15 2025 +0000, Jacek Caban wrote:
This is problematic both for reproducible builds and for the Windows widl build (used by mingw toolchains). I don’t know enough about the context to suggest concrete alternatives, would using a hash of other input data make sense for generating this GUID? Or maybe we could get away with something generated once. What do Windows tools use for this value?
-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/8037#note_103287