17 Apr
2025
17 Apr
'25
10:48 p.m.
On Thu Apr 17 07:55:43 2025 +0000, Rémi Bernon wrote:
Hmm, I'm not sure that moving timestamp generation to the unix side is better. ~~Can't we simply fill the sample timestamps from the input provided timestamps instead of the GStreamer-generated timestamps we don't really care about?~~ I did think of another way to do this; I could simply return another value from `wg_transform_read_mf` (in addition to the sample) to indicate that a timestamp has been provided. We could potentially even use the `flags` variable that is already being passed. Let me know if you'd prefer one of those options.
-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/7623#note_101342