26 Feb
2024
26 Feb
'24
4:03 p.m.
On Wed Feb 21 17:35:01 2024 +0000, Jacek Caban wrote:
That comment was meant as a reply to duplicated extensions comment. For `vk_is_available_device_function`, that's right (and that doesn't seem too problematic). I was thinking that ideally we'd just get rid of `vk_is_available_device_function`. We could store enabled extensions in VkDevice_T and implement `vkGetDeviceProcAddr` based on that, without any Unix calls. Yeah we could get rid of it, I guess is shouldn't be too hard to copy what mesa does here.
-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5128#note_62671