11 Nov
2024
11 Nov
'24
3:36 p.m.
On Mon Nov 11 15:37:29 2024 +0000, Matteo Bruni wrote:
Yeah, I was thinking about potentially passing the structure to `check_dds_header()`. This is certainly fine but I'm wondering what makes it ugly for other tests. Is it hard to make them table-based like `test_save_surface_to_dds()` (i.e. looping on test cases in a `tests[]` array of structures)? Largely just that it'd be extra work to make the older, existing tests that we're using this new function for table based and I'm lazy :D I can modify them to use a table if you think it'd be worth it.
-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/6776#note_87051