Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] MR8595: comctl32: Separate v5 and v6.

[Nikolay Sivov (＠nsivov)]

On Mon Jul 21 08:00:41 2025 +0000, Zhiyi Zhang wrote:
> \--prefer-native works. However, we need to mark comctl32 v5 as
> --perfer-native because comctl32.dll in the build dir is comctl32 v5.
> Then we still need to update the wine prefix every time after making
> changes to comctl32 v6 and rebuilding, because otherwise the comctl32 v6
> DLL in the wine prefix won't be updated, now that the DLL in the wine
> prefix is preferred. This would make the comctl32 development experience
> worse and bisecting comctl32 terrible. Comparing it to a special case in
> find_builtin_dll(), I prefer the latter. The changes to
> find_builtin_dll() are quite minimal.
> Another way would be to extend this builtin signature check to optionally include installed module name instead of assuming it's the same as a filename, so that we can specify comctl32_v6.dll there and build everything as builtin. I don't know if it's easy, because it requires variable length data.

-- 
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/8595#note_110484