Re: [PATCH v8 0/11] MR5444: jscript: Do not allocate dispex_prop_t for indexed props.

[Jacek Caban (＠jacek)]

On Fri Jun  7 14:39:29 2024 +0000, Gabriel Ivăncescu wrote:
> I see, if you look at it that way it makes sense to use IID, yeah (I was
> thinking of the functions as complete separate entities rather than
> interface implementations).
> I still think it's slightly better to just pass/store func_info_t as a
> container though—it's not just the args but everywhere else we need to
> store it (like in ProxyFunction as I mentioned), now it's one less field
> to worry about. And besides, if we ever do need to change it at some
> point later, it will be much easier without affecting call sites.
> Current func info is more than (id,iid) carrier, it would only make things more confusing to reuse it as an opaque with constrains like that. We could introduce a new struct, if needed.

-- 
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5444#note_73651