[PATCH 0/1] MR7418: wininet: Treat Expires value "-1" the same as "0"

[Yongjie Yao (＠yaoyongjie)]

In iis server, use -1 to specify immediate expiration.

For detailed documentation, please refer to:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/iis/6.0-sdk/ms525906(v=v...)

-- 
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/7418

[PATCH 1/1] wininet: Treat Expires value "-1" the same as "0"

[YongjieYao]

From: YongjieYao <yaoyongjie(a)uniontech.com>

In iis server, use -1 to specify immediate expiration.

For detailed documentation, please refer to:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/iis/6.0-sdk/ms525906(v=v...)
---
 dlls/wininet/http.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/dlls/wininet/http.c b/dlls/wininet/http.c
index 48bfe35866a..7d5862d3f07 100644
--- a/dlls/wininet/http.c
+++ b/dlls/wininet/http.c
@@ -4740,7 +4740,7 @@ static BOOL HTTP_ParseDate(LPCWSTR value, FILETIME *ft)
 {
     BOOL ret;
 
-    if (!wcscmp(value, L"0"))
+    if (!wcscmp(value, L"0") || !wcscmp(value, L"-1"))
     {
         ft->dwLowDateTime = ft->dwHighDateTime = 0;
         ret = TRUE;
-- 
GitLab

https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/7418

[Aida Jonikienė]

You should've updated !7323 instead of closing that MR

-- 
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/7418#note_95839

[Yongjie Yao (＠yaoyongjie)]

On Tue Feb 25 07:58:45 2025 +0000, Aida Jonikienė wrote:
> You should've updated !7323 instead of closing that MR
> Oh, sorry, what should I do now ? Should I reopen !7323 and update it or just keep !7418 ?  Which method is better ？

-- 
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/7418#note_95843

[Aida Jonikienė]

On Tue Feb 25 07:58:45 2025 +0000, Yongjie Yao wrote:
> Oh, sorry, what should I do now ? Should I reopen !7323 and update it or
> just keep !7418 ?  Which method is better ？
> I guess the former approach is better if the newer MR could be deleted (but if it couldn't, then either way is basically identical)

-- 
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/7418#note_95844

[Yongjie Yao (＠yaoyongjie)]

On Tue Feb 25 08:01:03 2025 +0000, Aida Jonikienė wrote:
> I guess the former approach is better if the newer MR could be deleted
> (but if it couldn't, then either way is basically identical)
> Ok, thank you, I try it.

-- 
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/7418#note_95845

[Jacek Caban (＠jacek)]

Yeah, let's keep in in that MR.

-- 
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/7418#note_95884

[PATCH 0/1] MR7418: wininet: Treat Expires value "-1" the same as "0" - closed

[Jacek Caban (＠jacek)]

This merge request was closed by Jacek Caban.
-- 
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/7418