Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] MR1060: include: Remove interfaces already define in msxml6.idl

[Nikolay Sivov (＠nsivov)]

On Fri Mar 22 03:18:49 2024 +0000, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> Is fixing the headers undesirable, then?
> Is it necessary in some way to implement FreeThreadedXMLHTTP60, or can
> that be done differently?
> No, I think it is desirable. I'm going to move some more tests out, to build with either msxml2.idl or msxml6.idl, and then we'll see what's left. XMLHTTP60 patches in the form they currently are in staging needs some work done, specifically not using rtworkq.dll.

-- 
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/1060#note_65806