Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] MR2598: imm32: Move IME UI window proc to the default implementation.

[Jacek Caban (＠jacek)]

On Fri Apr  7 14:53:00 2023 +0000, Rémi Bernon wrote:
> > I'm not sure what you mean by very integrated with win32u. Exposing
> > builtin IMEs as "normal" IMEs is not affected by changes that I suggest.
> > For driver interface, it would just replace one driver entry by another.
> > I think I was confused by the idea of adding win32u specific interface
> > for the callbacks. I'll consider doing this, as I think it also make
> > sense to pass NtUserNotifyIMEStatus calls.
> > I'm curious then, is there any advantage of using `NtUserMessageCall` vs
> > `NtUserCallOneParam` or one of the other flavor? `NtUserMessageCall`
> > takes a hwnd as first parameter, it feels a bit wrong to use an HIMC there.
> > I'd expect that `NtUserMessageCall` would be a bit nicer for wow64, because it may just pass through arguments like `NtUserSpyGetMsgName`, but yeah, handle type mismatch is not that nice.

-- 
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/2598#note_29322