Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] MR9504: Reparse points, part 5.

[Elizabeth Figura (＠zfigura)]

> Sure. I honestly wasn't sure whether exposing them as SYMLINK or LX_SYMLINK made more sense.

So for what it's worth, there is an application, bug 39627, that chokes on IO_REPARSE_TAG_LX_SYMLINK, and only seems to handle IO_REPARSE_TAG_SYMLINK. I don't know if that's a good enough reason by itself, though.

-- 
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/9504#note_125353