Favor: help me fill two holes
Folks, I think I'm down to having two 30 minute holes. The schedule should now be starting to be visible here: https://fosdem.org/2014/schedule/track/wine/ Pipelight and a 'user focused topic' are going to go in until 11:30. I've got mingw-64 going in from 3:30 until 4:10 or so. That leaves me a 30 minute gap in the morning, and a 40-50 minute gap in the afternoon. Vincent was willing to be made to do a Mono talk again, but I think it'd be a mistake to make that more than a few minute cry for help. So, anyone have an itch? I was thinking of doing a brief make test / winetestbot review for 30 minutes. Anyone willing to lead that? Michael, you've got to be able to do something funny and fun about being a janitor, right? Austin, anyone, want to talk about bugs or appdb? Cheers, Jeremy
On 01/08/2014 01:53 PM, Jeremy White wrote:
Folks,
I think I'm down to having two 30 minute holes.
The schedule should now be starting to be visible here: https://fosdem.org/2014/schedule/track/wine/
Pipelight and a 'user focused topic' are going to go in until 11:30.
I've got mingw-64 going in from 3:30 until 4:10 or so.
That leaves me a 30 minute gap in the morning, and a 40-50 minute gap in the afternoon.
Vincent was willing to be made to do a Mono talk again, but I think it'd be a mistake to make that more than a few minute cry for help.
So, anyone have an itch?
I was thinking of doing a brief make test / winetestbot review for 30 minutes. Anyone willing to lead that?
Michael, you've got to be able to do something funny and fun about being a janitor, right? I would prefer to have a discussion session with the Wine package maintainers of the different distributions out there.
Austin, anyone, want to talk about bugs or appdb?
bye michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 2014-01-08 13:53, schrieb Jeremy White:
That leaves me a 30 minute gap in the morning, and a 40-50 minute gap in the afternoon. We could have a flamewar about formatting fixes. I think we should just bite the bullet and unify the entire codebase. The basic premise: How often do we run git blame vs how often does a potential contributor have problems due to plain formatting issue.
However I don't know if that would be a particularly appealing discussion for the general public. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSzWAgAAoJEN0/YqbEcdMw60kP/RYgQoinltQ6Y1+ks+0R8urv 4L7vTxhJaorZbD7sJqKr1Q4sOA7qi1Ayg1E9oKWYQYZYsx2DIPHzaanEfNh8xqcS xGeiP6VKk5RvUAcfdoIT0TJ4UlZcY/3Z6U9MPslow3TsTmQIbWIFibz8x9CJ6oPu RRgqo6/jIyI55OlYPTThQnhz9kY9bHbhwAnRXoys61HHOBBA+vzl7Lt54aeWnbzy ydjX7EgwDkJ35WrhOj93qNAYhlnF5AN3nHmepEJmqNLEgtOY0v2h0TTIhHribxFk 5p9QfQXNzBnOKS3SrfbQbgVyoH3QAXzEGe7jqhDSDf7tlY/qEyL8NiNMvbe6ggWC MeK/CyXlGRJoiQuL7Y6UhQQJuZJkCP7iFwZv/ETBouFY9vdZj82VvXMjQb+wPQUl Do8lJiFM9ltJBSh3KKPefPbm4BMfgUrVtEoRSrLbvLBLvYAfmn6TP12omPzJvNQP Oy5/zHJ15iB2jRT/Ll9Iu+cgGu8Gg+zTv2DnpUA1SEDja28wC1xtApkYOwt5O4yK avIPApZV0t6+u6+6S/Bvc9R3EI9MXsGVal/tW+I+1EQNqnJsOPrFOX0gZW4FFIZP ceca5mt2r4a2faFKg8N0K/oo3Nk1rdcFT8+SWFo9V8sxmusEnbA1KMKqKyhFjN6z i09/YxYkYXr2sQmCauem =P58e -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger(a)gmx.at> wrote:
... We could have a flamewar about formatting fixes. I think we should just bite the bullet and unify the entire codebase. The basic premise: How often do we run git blame vs how often does a potential contributor have problems due to plain formatting issue.
However I don't know if that would be a particularly appealing discussion for the general public.
I can't make it this year (the conference is coincident with one I need to attend for work), but I'd like to chime in and say it would be nice to have a git pre-commit script that we could offer to people that properly formats patches. I'd say it's at least a good candidate to fill a hole, I know that I'd be interested in tuning in to it once it's available online ;) Best, Erich
On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 06:53:51 -0600 Jeremy White <jwhite(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
Austin, anyone, want to talk about bugs or appdb?
I could give an earful of AppDB problems, but whether anyone would be interested is highly questionable. -- Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net>
On Wed, 8 Jan 2014, Jeremy White wrote: [...]
So, anyone have an itch?
I was thinking of doing a brief make test / winetestbot review for 30 minutes. Anyone willing to lead that?
If there's interest I can give a short TestBot status update. Maybe talk about how to automate running WineTest on one's Linux/Windows computer. But looking at the WineTest results may be too depressing... -- Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)codeweavers.com>
If there's interest I can give a short TestBot status update. Maybe talk about how to automate running WineTest on one's Linux/Windows computer.
But looking at the WineTest results may be too depressing...
I have added you to this talk that I entered: https://fosdem.org/2014/schedule/event/wine_test/ I thought I would start with a brief overview of the Wine unit tests, purportedly for non Wine folks, and then sound a cry for help. It struck me that the most constructive thing that could come out of this topic would be people fixing tests on WineTestBot. Seem fair? Feel free to suggest that I twist it another direction. Cheers, Jeremy
participants (6)
-
Erich E. Hoover -
Francois Gouget -
Jeremy White -
Michael Stefaniuc -
Rosanne DiMesio -
Stefan Dösinger