Feb. 13, 2010
3:47 a.m.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10495 --- Comment #208 from Rotbart van Dainig <rotbart_van_dainig(a)lavabit.com> 2010-02-13 03:47:39 --- (In reply to comment #203)
Seriously, there are better reasons for pulse to be supported than this.
Could you please state them?
I have no objection to pulseaudio being supported *correctly*.
Could you please define what means "correctly" to you, too? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.