Feb. 2, 2022
6:44 p.m.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47198 --- Comment #115 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to David Torok from comment #114) > Well, this was a while back but as I remember I don't believe syscalls were > executed after the far jump that changes %cs. Between the 2 far jump %cs > changes only the 64 bit TEB->PEB access happened. So as far as I understand, > there is no need to be able to "directly execute" 64 bit syscalls from a 32 > bit process. The normal "syscall path" for this application follows wine's > own syscall thunks. (Therefore also eliminating the need to solve bug 48291) >From the analysis shared with me by Andrew Wesie a couple years ago I believe there were direct SYSCALL instructions. Note also the contents of attachment 64481. Perhaps that's changed since then. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.