[Bug 43310] New: valgrind shows several definite leaks in dlls/advapi32/ tests/security.c
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43310 Bug ID: 43310 Summary: valgrind shows several definite leaks in dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c Product: Wine Version: 2.12 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: advapi32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- ==25974== 13 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 22 of 264 ==25974== at 0x7BC50812: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==25974== by 0x7BC54C93: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==25974== by 0x7B449A29: HeapAlloc (heap.c:271) ==25974== by 0x7B44B158: LocalAlloc (heap.c:970) ==25974== by 0x4E656F5: ConvertSidToStringSidA (security.c:5283) ==25974== by 0x4A68048: test_token_label (security.c:6787) ==25974== by 0x4A69DD5: func_security (security.c:7131) ==25974== by 0x4A7926E: run_test (test.h:603) ==25974== by 0x4A796C0: main (test.h:687) ==25974== ==25974== 20 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 54 of 264 ==25974== at 0x7BC50812: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==25974== by 0x7BC54C93: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==25974== by 0x7B449A29: HeapAlloc (heap.c:271) ==25974== by 0x7B44B158: LocalAlloc (heap.c:970) ==25974== by 0x4E60D26: GetSecurityInfo (security.c:3267) ==25974== by 0x4A66125: test_system_security_access (security.c:6479) ==25974== by 0x4A69DC1: func_security (security.c:7127) ==25974== by 0x4A7926E: run_test (test.h:603) ==25974== by 0x4A796C0: main (test.h:687) ==25974== ==25974== 148 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 183 of 264 ==25974== at 0x7BC50812: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==25974== by 0x7BC54C93: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==25974== by 0x7B449A29: HeapAlloc (heap.c:271) ==25974== by 0x7B44B158: LocalAlloc (heap.c:970) ==25974== by 0x4E60D26: GetSecurityInfo (security.c:3267) ==25974== by 0x4A5BCC5: test_GetSecurityInfo (security.c:4616) ==25974== by 0x4A69D85: func_security (security.c:7115) ==25974== by 0x4A7926E: run_test (test.h:603) ==25974== by 0x4A796C0: main (test.h:687) ==25974== ==25950== 13 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 21 of 258 ==25950== at 0x7BC50812: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==25950== by 0x7BC54C93: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==25950== by 0x7B449A29: HeapAlloc (heap.c:271) ==25950== by 0x7B44B158: LocalAlloc (heap.c:970) ==25950== by 0x4E656F5: ConvertSidToStringSidA (security.c:5283) ==25950== by 0x4A68048: test_token_label (security.c:6787) ==25950== by 0x4A69DD5: func_security (security.c:7131) ==25950== by 0x4A7926E: run_test (test.h:603) ==25950== by 0x4A796C0: main (test.h:687) ==25950== ==25950== 20 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 52 of 258 ==25950== at 0x7BC50812: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==25950== by 0x7BC54C93: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==25950== by 0x7B449A29: HeapAlloc (heap.c:271) ==25950== by 0x7B44B158: LocalAlloc (heap.c:970) ==25950== by 0x4E60D26: GetSecurityInfo (security.c:3267) ==25950== by 0x4A66125: test_system_security_access (security.c:6479) ==25950== by 0x4A69DC1: func_security (security.c:7127) ==25950== by 0x4A7926E: run_test (test.h:603) ==25950== by 0x4A796C0: main (test.h:687) ==25950== ==25950== 84 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 153 of 258 ==25950== at 0x7BC50812: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==25950== by 0x7BC54C93: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==25950== by 0x4A68DF7: test_token_security_descriptor (security.c:6921) ==25950== by 0x4A69DDA: func_security (security.c:7134) ==25950== by 0x4A7926E: run_test (test.h:603) ==25950== by 0x4A796C0: main (test.h:687) ==25950== ==25950== 148 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 179 of 258 ==25950== at 0x7BC50812: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==25950== by 0x7BC54C93: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==25950== by 0x7B449A29: HeapAlloc (heap.c:271) ==25950== by 0x7B44B158: LocalAlloc (heap.c:970) ==25950== by 0x4E60D26: GetSecurityInfo (security.c:3267) ==25950== by 0x4A5BCC5: test_GetSecurityInfo (security.c:4616) ==25950== by 0x4A69D85: func_security (security.c:7115) ==25950== by 0x4A7926E: run_test (test.h:603) ==25950== by 0x4A796C0: main (test.h:687) ==25950== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43310 Matteo Bruni <matteo.mystral(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Fixed by SHA1| |9ccce0ce645f089063ed61bec53 | |644a138ac0a37 Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Matteo Bruni <matteo.mystral(a)gmail.com> --- This should be fixed by 9ccce0ce645f089063ed61bec53644a138ac0a37, aside from the last block which is expected: /* If we don't ask for the security descriptor, Windows will still give us the other stuff, leaving us no way to free it. */ -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43310 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Closing bugs fixed in 3.0-rc6. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org