[Bug 33018] New: PDH does not support the 'Processor' object string
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33018 Bug #: 33018 Summary: PDH does not support the 'Processor' object string Product: Wine Version: 1.5.24 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: pdh AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: ehoover(a)mines.edu Classification: Unclassified Calling PdhLookupPerfNameByIndex with the index 238 should return the string 'Processor', this is used by Silverlight to construct the string: \Processor(_Total#0)\% Processor Time to obtain the processor usage. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33018 --- Comment #1 from Erich Hoover <ehoover(a)mines.edu> 2013-02-19 10:09:11 CST --- Created attachment 43638 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=43638 pdh: Support the 'Processor' object string. Patch to correct the problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33018 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33018 super_man(a)post.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |super_man(a)post.com --- Comment #2 from super_man(a)post.com --- Patch still applies (how much value it has?) Send to patches list? patching file dlls/pdh/pdh_main.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 192 (offset 1 line). Hunk #2 succeeded at 220 (offset 1 line). patching file dlls/pdh/tests/pdh.c wine-1.7.52-190-gd548639 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33018 --- Comment #3 from Erich E. Hoover <erich.e.hoover(a)wine-staging.com> --- (In reply to super_man from comment #2)
Patch still applies (how much value it has?) Send to patches list?
Do you have an application that cares? I ran across this getting Silverlight working, but it didn't end up being relevant. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33018 super_man(a)post.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |focht(a)gmx.net -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33018 Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com Staged patchset| |https://github.com/wine-sta | |ging/wine-staging/tree/mast | |er/patches/pdh-PdhLookupPer | |fNameByIndex-processor Status|NEW |STAGED -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33018 Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |z.figura12(a)gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- If Silverlight didn't actually need this, is there value in keeping this around? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33018 --- Comment #5 from Erich E. Hoover <erich.e.hoover(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Zebediah Figura from comment #4)
If Silverlight didn't actually need this, is there value in keeping this around?
I don't think so, I'd say it's safe to drop this one at this point. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33018 Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|STAGED |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- Resolving this as INVALID then, thanks! -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33018 Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #7 from Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> --- Closing bugs marked as invalid -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (2)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org -
WineHQ Bugzilla