[Bug 36581] New: valgrind shows a few leaks in winmm/tests/capture.c
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36581 Bug ID: 36581 Summary: valgrind shows a few leaks in winmm/tests/capture.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.19 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winmm&mci Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com austin(a)aw25 ~/wine-valgrind/dlls/winmm/tests $ make capture.ok ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -T ../../.. -M winmm.dll -p winmm_test.exe.so capture && touch capture.ok preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00110000-68000000 preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 7f000000-82000000 ==26292== 512 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 665 of 832 ==26292== at 0x7BC4C6DF: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==26292== by 0x7BC50F23: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==26292== by 0x5126CA4: list_window_children (win.c:318) ==26292== by 0x512EE26: WIN_ListChildren (win.c:3267) ==26292== by 0x512B3BC: WIN_SendDestroyMsg (win.c:1783) ==26292== by 0x512B7F5: DestroyWindow (win.c:1876) ==26292== by 0x4FDF40A: WINMM_DevicesThreadDone (waveform.c:2445) ==26292== by 0x4FDF896: WINMM_DevicesThreadProc (waveform.c:2516) ==26292== by 0x7BC870C7: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==26292== by 0x7BC87110: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2630) ==26292== by 0x7BC870A5: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==26292== by 0x7BC8E4EC: start_thread (thread.c:428) ==26292== by 0x421FF92: start_thread (pthread_create.c:309) ==26292== by 0x43247ED: clone (clone.S:129) ==26292== ==26292== 5,940 bytes in 330 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 818 of 832 ==26292== at 0x7BC4C6DF: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==26292== by 0x7BC50F23: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==26292== by 0x4FDACEF: WINMM_OpenDevice (waveform.c:1093) ==26292== by 0x4FDBCAB: WID_Open (waveform.c:1361) ==26292== by 0x4FDF30B: WINMM_DevicesMsgProc (waveform.c:2413) ==26292== by 0x51394F5: ??? (winproc.c:173) ==26292== by 0x513966A: call_window_proc (winproc.c:244) ==26292== by 0x513B803: WINPROC_call_window (winproc.c:900) ==26292== by 0x50F811C: call_window_proc (message.c:2223) ==26292== by 0x50FA320: peek_message (message.c:2953) ==26292== by 0x50FBDC6: PeekMessageW (message.c:3757) ==26292== by 0x4FDF773: WINMM_DevicesThreadProc (waveform.c:2503) ==26292== by 0x7BC870C7: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==26292== by 0x7BC87110: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2630) ==26292== by 0x7BC870A5: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==26292== by 0x7BC8E4EC: start_thread (thread.c:428) ==26292== by 0x421FF92: start_thread (pthread_create.c:309) ==26292== by 0x43247ED: clone (clone.S:129) ==26292== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36581 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |valgrind -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36581 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Distribution|--- |Gentoo -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36581 --- Comment #1 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- ==2520== 512 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 603 of 719 ==2520== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==2520== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==2520== by 0x4CD5934: list_window_children (win.c:319) ==2520== by 0x4CDE503: WIN_ListChildren (win.c:3309) ==2520== by 0x4CDAABF: DestroyWindow (win.c:1881) ==2520== by 0x4B8E3DD: WINMM_DevicesThreadDone (waveform.c:2446) ==2520== by 0x4B8E79F: WINMM_DevicesThreadProc (waveform.c:2517) ==2520== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2520== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==2520== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2520== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==2520== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==2520== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36581 Austin English <austinenglish@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |ABANDONED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Austin English <austinenglish@gmail.com> --- Modern wine doesn't play well with valgrind. Marking valgrind bugs as abandoned. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36581 Austin English <austinenglish@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Austin English <austinenglish@gmail.com> --- Closing. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (2)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org -
WineHQ Bugzilla