[Bug 47715] New: Maximized Window size and location is incorrect if overridden by WM_GETMINMAXINFO or SetWindowPos
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47715 Bug ID: 47715 Summary: Maximized Window size and location is incorrect if overridden by WM_GETMINMAXINFO or SetWindowPos Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: user32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: danweiss(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 65185 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=65185 Example WIN32 program that demonstrates the bug Tested on Wine Staging 4.14 on MX Linux. On Windows, you can use WM_GETMINMAXINFO, then a maximized window will appear with a specified size and location. Even though the window is considered Maximized, it is not necessarily covering up the whole screen. You can also use SetWindowPos to move the maximized window to a specific location and size. After calling SetWindowPos, the window will immediately move and resize. The next time the window is restored, then maximized, it will snap back to the coordinates specified in WM_GETMINMAXINFO. When I run the test program on Windows 10, it create the window at location (256,256), with size 256x256, then moves it to location (512,256). When I try this on Wine, Maximized means maximized, and the window fills the entire region that a maximized program would occupy. It does not take into account the maximized size specified in WM_GETMINMAXINFO or SetWindowPos. Related bugs: 5941 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47715 --- Comment #1 from Dan Weiss <danweiss(a)gmail.com> --- I also tested GetWindowRect. It returns the numbers that it is supposed to be returning, and claims that the window is 256x256 large, while the actual screen shows it at a full maximized size. So now I'm confused to which component is messing up. Is it wine? Xorg? XFCE? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47715 --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Under X there's no way to specify the size of a maximized window, so all we can do is ask for a maximized window and let the window manager decide the size. If you really need that behavior (why?) you'd have to run in desktop mode. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47715 Fabian Maurer <dark.shadow4(a)web.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dark.shadow4(a)web.de -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47715 winetaste(a)gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |winetaste(a)gmx.net -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org