[Bug 48264] New: WineHQ Debian repos are missing Wine 4.21
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Bug ID: 48264 Summary: WineHQ Debian repos are missing Wine 4.21 Product: Packaging Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-packages Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: shtetldik(a)gmail.com CC: dimesio(a)earthlink.net, michael(a)fds-team.de, sebastian(a)fds-team.de Distribution: --- WineHQ Debian repo (testing for example) is still at 4.20, even though 4.21 came out at the end of last month already: https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-amd64/ -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- Probably the same issue that's causing bug 48250. FYI, the packages are in http://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/bullseye/main/binary-amd64/. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- Fixed. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #3 from Shmerl <shtetldik(a)gmail.com> --- Looks like the problem is not fixed. It's again missing in WineHQ repo for Debian for 5.0-rc1. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #4 from Shmerl <shtetldik(a)gmail.com> --- I mean Debian testing: https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-amd64/ -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jnewman(a)codeweavers.com, | |julliard(a)winehq.org Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Summary|WineHQ Debian repos are |WineHQ Debian Testing repo |missing Wine 4.21 |not updating Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #5 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- The bullseye repository has the packages, but testing didn't update. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #6 from Shmerl <shtetldik(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Rosanne DiMesio from comment #5)
The bullseye repository has the packages, but testing didn't update.
Yep. I configure apt the following way: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/wine.list deb https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/ testing main To avoid changing the file every time distro codename changes. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #7 from Shmerl <shtetldik(a)gmail.com> --- Interestingly, I see 5.0~rc3~bullseye packages here: https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-amd64/ But they aren't being pulled with: sudo apt update sudo apt full-upgrade The repo is configured as: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/wine.list deb https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/ testing main -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #8 from Shmerl <shtetldik(a)gmail.com> --- May be it's because wine-devel-i386_5.0~rc3 is missing here: https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-i386/ -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #9 from Shmerl <shtetldik(a)gmail.com> --- Now both 64-bit and 32-bit are missing for 5.0~rc4: https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-amd64/ https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-i386/ -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #10 from Shmerl <shtetldik(a)gmail.com> --- Still a problem for 5.0~rc5. May be it's something to do with rc naming scheme that broke previous workflow? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #11 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- (In reply to Shmerl from comment #10)
Still a problem for 5.0~rc5. May be it's something to do with rc naming scheme that broke previous workflow?
The problem started before code freeze. It also affects Debian stable and Debian oldstable, though no one seems to have noticed, so perhaps we shouldn't bother with them. What all three have in common is that they are symlinks to the actual directories, which have the packages and are updating correctly. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #12 from Shmerl <shtetldik(a)gmail.com> --- May be you can make it into a hardlink then? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gero45(a)mr-gero.de --- Comment #13 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- *** Bug 48786 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #14 from Gero <gero45(a)mr-gero.de> --- It's also a problem for version 5.4. Version for amd64 is missing, its available on the build server though: https://build.opensuse.org/package/binaries/Emulators:Wine:Debian/wine-stagi... Strange. But maybe I also missunderstand the problem. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Heinz Repp <heinz.repp(a)arcor.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |heinz.repp(a)arcor.de --- Comment #15 from Heinz Repp <heinz.repp(a)arcor.de> --- I already mailed it to the maintainers, but they pointed me to this bug. Reason why apt on testing does not update is, they forgot to update the Release/inRelease files. testing/Release is from Sat, 21 Dec 2019 20:28:57 +0000, and inRelease from Mon, 03 Feb 2020 09:18:38 +0000. APT uses this files to determine file size and hashes for Packages.xz, and clearly those differ. So APT ignores this repository completely. This can only be solved by the maintainers updating Release/inRelease files with current file sizes and hashes, and then APT will happily use this repository again. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #16 from Shmerl <shtetldik(a)gmail.com> --- @Rosanne DiMesio: Does the above method that Heinz Repp suggested, help? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #17 from Shmerl <shtetldik(a)gmail.com> --- Looks like all files are recent now in the repo, but whey trying to update from it, I got: Err:4 https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian testing/main i386 Packages File has unexpected size (149376 != 132452). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: 151.101.2.217 443] Hashes of expected file: - Filesize:132452 [weak] - SHA512:b80fec1c33865a3a0d2e5d62bc091a50397a01444916f34112ab2aa1fafded075f36c40041730487da2bf24665f8783f664e05f97145ce470ad1cf68343fd017 - SHA256:2fa9d8faef7decc80a5b852feaa894dcf4a24e461f7ba8e1c296e0a0ad40c2c7 - SHA1:3107775d1568c8a6bf5b4af9afdddd909612ed57 [weak] - MD5Sum:b36422348a946662fb3d50ebd5e4af22 [weak] Release file created at: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 09:18:38 +0000 Get:5 https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian testing/main amd64 Packages [125 kB] Err:5 https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian testing/main amd64 Packages Reading package lists... Done E: Failed to fetch https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-i386/Pack... File has unexpected size (149376 != 132452). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: 151.101.2.217 443] Hashes of expected file: - Filesize:132452 [weak] - SHA512:b80fec1c33865a3a0d2e5d62bc091a50397a01444916f34112ab2aa1fafded075f36c40041730487da2bf24665f8783f664e05f97145ce470ad1cf68343fd017 - SHA256:2fa9d8faef7decc80a5b852feaa894dcf4a24e461f7ba8e1c296e0a0ad40c2c7 - SHA1:3107775d1568c8a6bf5b4af9afdddd909612ed57 [weak] - MD5Sum:b36422348a946662fb3d50ebd5e4af22 [weak] Release file created at: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 09:18:38 +0000 E: Failed to fetch https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-amd64/Pac... E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. Aborting on non zero error code: 100! -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #18 from Heinz Repp <heinz.repp(a)arcor.de> --- (In reply to Shmerl from comment #17)
Looks like all files are recent now in the repo, but whey trying to update from it, I got:
No they are not. InRelease and Release are still the same old outdated files. InRelease: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Architectures: i386 amd64 Codename: bullseye Components: main Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 09:18:38 +0000 Description: WineHQ packages Label: winehq Origin: dl.winehq.org Suite: testing and Release: Architectures: i386 amd64 Codename: bullseye Components: main Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 09:18:47 +0000 Description: WineHQ packages Label: winehq Origin: dl.winehq.org Suite: testing look at the dates! -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #19 from Shmerl <shtetldik(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Heinz Repp from comment #18)
(In reply to Shmerl from comment #17)
Looks like all files are recent now in the repo, but whey trying to update from it, I got:
No they are not. InRelease and Release are still the same old outdated files.
Ah, good point. I just checked inside, and they are indeed outdated. Something is quite messed up. Here is the summary: https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/bullseye/InRelease Modification time: 2020-03-29 06:18 Content: Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 10:50:17 +0000 https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/bullseye/Release Modification time: 2020-03-29 05:50 Content: Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 10:50:17 +0000 https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/testing/InRelease Modification time: 2020-03-14 16:10 Content: Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 09:18:38 +0000 https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/testing/Release Modification time: 2020-03-14 15:31 Content: Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 09:18:47 +0000 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #20 from Heinz Repp <heinz.repp(a)arcor.de> --- ah, ok, I see the bullseye files are up to date, but the testing files are not. It would be so easy to copy the bullseye (In)Release files over to testing or softlinking them, no idea why they didn't it by now ... -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #21 from Heinz Repp <heinz.repp(a)arcor.de> --- and additional the Packages.* files too, currently they are (binary-amd64) from 2020-01-12 06:25. Seems they did not update the whole testing branch since months, maybe they they can do themselves a favor and delete the whole testing hierarchy and replace it with a softlink to the bullseye folder ... -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #22 from Heinz Repp <heinz.repp(a)arcor.de> --- and for all watching this bug: the workaround for the time being is to replace 'testing' by 'bullseye' in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/winehq.list, with this the updater pulled the 5.5 packages (over 5.01-rc2, that was the last version when the testing repository still worked). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #23 from Shmerl <shtetldik(a)gmail.com> --- Newest release has the same problem. It really should be easy to fix. Is anything really blocking it? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Emir Ensar <emirensar(a)protonmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emirensar(a)protonmail.com -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #24 from Emir Ensar <emirensar(a)protonmail.com> --- Same problem here in the Debian Unstable, the staging package is still at e-4.0-rc2 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #25 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- (In reply to Emir Ensar from comment #24)
Same problem here in the Debian Unstable, the staging package is still at e-4.0-rc2
We discontinued building packages for Debian Unstable when we moved to the OBS. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #26 from Emir Ensar <emirensar(a)protonmail.com> ---
We discontinued building packages for Debian Unstable when we moved to the OBS.
What's an OBS? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #27 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- (In reply to Emir Ensar from comment #26)
What's an OBS?
It's the openSUSE build service, which is where the WineHQ packages are currently built. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #28 from Shmerl <shtetldik(a)gmail.com> --- FYI: I was able to successfully update Wine on Debian testing from 6.2~bullseye-1 to 6.3~bullseye-1 using testing repo: deb https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/ testing main So it looks like it's working OK now. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #29 from Shmerl <shtetldik(a)gmail.com> --- This bug is reoccurring now for some reason. Take a look at locations for "testing" i386 one is missing 7.19: https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-i386/ And amd64 one is missing 7.17, 7.18 and 7.19! https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-amd64/ So something is definitely off. Using this wine.sources works OK: Types: deb URIs: https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian Suites: bookworm Components: main Architectures: amd64 i386 Signed-By: /etc/apt/keyrings/winehq.key But when using with Suites: testing it's obviously not working right because of the above. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Ed Peguillan III <edward.j.peguillan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |edward.j.peguillan(a)gmail.co | |m --- Comment #30 from Ed Peguillan III <edward.j.peguillan(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 73736 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=73736 apt log showing unexpected filesize/hash -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #31 from Ed Peguillan III <edward.j.peguillan(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 73737 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=73737 /etc/apt/sources.list.d/winehq.list -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #32 from Ed Peguillan III <edward.j.peguillan(a)gmail.com> --- I have been having this error for the last month or so with winehq stable (i386 + amd64, it seems) for Debian. It perpetually tells me a mirror sync is possibly in progress. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #33 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- *** Bug 54358 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #34 from Heinz Repp <heinz.repp(a)arcor.de> --- I can confirm that with bookworm instead testing it works. So it seems that the architecture of winehq is broken. FWIW I think that "testing" should be just a symlink to "bookworm", as "stable" should be a symlink to "bullseye", and changing the symlinks when a new Debian version comes out. This way it would be easy to maintain, and no such errors would occur. I had expected it to be like this, but had to find out that it repeatedly broke because it is not so. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #35 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- (In reply to Heinz Repp from comment #34)
I can confirm that with bookworm instead testing it works. So it seems that the architecture of winehq is broken. FWIW I think that "testing" should be just a symlink to "bookworm", as "stable" should be a symlink to "bullseye", and changing the symlinks when a new Debian version comes out. This way it would be easy to maintain, and no such errors would occur. I had expected it to be like this, but had to find out that it repeatedly broke because it is not so.
That is exactly how it's done. The problem is that the symlinks sometimes confuse the CDN mirrors and files don't get refreshed properly. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Marcel Partap <mpartap(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mpartap(a)gmx.net --- Comment #36 from Marcel Partap <mpartap(a)gmx.net> --- *** Bug 53901 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mywine(a)schiermeier-it.de --- Comment #37 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- *** Bug 55514 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 will.feavyour(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |will.feavyour(a)gmail.com --- Comment #38 from will.feavyour(a)gmail.com --- Hi, this looks like an ongoing issue with the latest package, could someone please advise how to resolve? For Ubuntu Noble, InRelease updated 06/Oct/2024 10:41:46 https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu/dists/noble/InRelease Example line: b3224eb6eabe0894da86c3829140cc77 51543 main/binary-i386/Packages.gz But the file at "main/binary-i386/Packages.gz" is 55,647 bytes, and was updated at a different time to the InRelease file (19/Oct/2024 03:39) so we get the error when updating: Get:2 https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu noble/main i386 Packages [51.5 kB] Err:2 https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu noble/main i386 Packages File has unexpected size (55647 != 51543). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: 151.101.2.217 443] Hashes of expected file: - Filesize:51543 [weak] - SHA512:8ccd7d82077fb9bc746bdfdaf25a7dd3c1d0b2d8e79c3a320bfb5bb72fbba100b05b51d47af6cf07813dc72255d3e8912fca02bcafa6 - SHA256:412edc5df805c990088c05a06d2da02000e0000914d26d552841f5a891c8100c - SHA1:8c4bebd005ebeec17dab83cc92132b400942c7bf [weak] - MD5Sum:b3224eb6eabe0894da86c3829140cc77 [weak] Release file created at: Sun, 06 Oct 2024 10:41:46 +0000 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Chris Wallis <chris.wallis+winehqbug(a)c-tek.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.wallis+winehqbug(a)c-te | |k.org -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #39 from Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> --- *** Bug 58281 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |http://bugs.winehq.org/show | |_bug.cgi?id=58292 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Norton Kitagawa <norton.kitagawa(a)venn.bio> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |norton.kitagawa(a)venn.bio --- Comment #40 from Norton Kitagawa <norton.kitagawa(a)venn.bio> --- I have been seeing this for the past several days, even on `bookworm` builds. Interestingly, the `binary-amd64/Packages.xz` seems truncated (always in the same place), then the subsequent `binary-i386/Packages.xz` fails to download at all. (Network issue?) ----- E: Failed to fetch https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/bookworm/main/binary-amd64/Pa... File has unexpected size (343052 != 344812). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: 151.101.2.217 443] Hashes of expected file: - Filesize:344812 [weak] - SHA512:4b8e95b27ce8cba897a69e4608892e141f6dc2bc0026e7486d8031a531279c9a4c5d4cdb6f92af9c7da8fa96e3ca11b298de9f4834298886f512f98e4000fd9b - SHA256:ed9486b1a5a74ff38f2fdaab5981454992a726e299570483330429af4f75398d - SHA1:2634c554acfa9ea0171ec54c4433d12f8e3accea [weak] - MD5Sum:05b728d41b6baf0d8d054771594a122e [weak] Release file created at: Sun, 18 May 2025 15:03:55 +0000 E: Failed to fetch https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/bookworm/main/binary-i386/Pac... ----- This failure is happening in a Docker build environment and fails the same way even if the Docker build cache is purged. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #41 from Norton Kitagawa <norton.kitagawa(a)venn.bio> --- I have been seeing this for the past several days, even on `bookworm` builds. Interestingly, the `binary-amd64/Packages.xz` seems truncated (always in the same place), then the subsequent `binary-i386/Packages.xz` fails to download at all. (Network issue?) ----- E: Failed to fetch https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/bookworm/main/binary-amd64/Pa... File has unexpected size (343052 != 344812). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: 151.101.2.217 443] Hashes of expected file: - Filesize:344812 [weak] - SHA512:4b8e95b27ce8cba897a69e4608892e141f6dc2bc0026e7486d8031a531279c9a4c5d4cdb6f92af9c7da8fa96e3ca11b298de9f4834298886f512f98e4000fd9b - SHA256:ed9486b1a5a74ff38f2fdaab5981454992a726e299570483330429af4f75398d - SHA1:2634c554acfa9ea0171ec54c4433d12f8e3accea [weak] - MD5Sum:05b728d41b6baf0d8d054771594a122e [weak] Release file created at: Sun, 18 May 2025 15:03:55 +0000 E: Failed to fetch https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/bookworm/main/binary-i386/Pac... ----- This failure is happening in a Docker build environment and fails the same way even if the Docker build cache is purged. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Justin Smith <justin.w.smith(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |justin.w.smith(a)gmail.com --- Comment #42 from Justin Smith <justin.w.smith(a)gmail.com> --- We've been having trouble for the past week or so with our CI jobs that attempt to install Wine: * https://github.com/aws/aws-lc/actions/runs/15348759639/job/43191356498?pr=24... * https://github.com/aws/aws-lc/actions/runs/15285649157/job/43188838457?pr=24... However, the problem is inconsistent. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Jeremy Newman <jnewman(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|WineHQ Debian Testing repo |WineHQ repo (apt/dnf) data |not updating |not updating --- Comment #43 from Jeremy Newman <jnewman(a)codeweavers.com> --- I wrote a quick script to flush the CDN cache of the apt repo release/package files. Let me know if that cleared it up for this release on Debian/Ubuntu/Fedora. I don't think that on update of the repos we are properly telling the CDN to purge the files. We used to use a file update notifier so that when the files would update, they would auto-purge, but that isn't an option anymore with AWS. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Jeremy Newman <jnewman(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emrul.i(a)gmail.com --- Comment #44 from Jeremy Newman <jnewman(a)codeweavers.com> --- *** Bug 58292 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Jeremy Newman <jnewman(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mikes(a)kuentos.guam.net --- Comment #45 from Jeremy Newman <jnewman(a)codeweavers.com> --- *** Bug 58260 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #46 from Norton Kitagawa <norton.kitagawa(a)venn.bio> --- (In reply to Jeremy Newman from comment #43)
I wrote a quick script to flush the CDN cache of the apt repo release/package files.
Let me know if that cleared it up for this release on Debian/Ubuntu/Fedora.
This did address it for me on `bookworm`, as I was able to build successfully this morning with no code changes. Thank you! -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 --- Comment #47 from Michael Setzer II <mikes(a)kuentos.guam.net> --- Just did a test and seems to work fine on Fedora 42. No checksum error. Generally, if did a dnf clean all, it would create a script that would remove that file, and had a file that would restore the files I had captured from a machine that worked. winehq.gz contained. ls -lr total 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 May 22 15:26 solv drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 May 22 15:25 repodata drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 May 22 20:45 attrs root(a)setzcodell:/tmp/x# ls -lR .: total 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 May 22 20:45 attrs drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 May 22 15:25 repodata drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 May 22 15:26 solv ./attrs: total 0 ./repodata: total 64 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 58543 May 22 20:45 primary.xml.zst -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2707 May 22 15:25 repomd.xml ./solv: total 120 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 121496 May 22 15:26 WineHQ.solv Restore these files to the /var/cache/libdnf5 would then have winehq work. Now the dnf clean all removes the winehq directory so it has no expired file. So now that is no longer needed. Thanks. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 wschmrdr(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wschmrdr(a)gmail.com --- Comment #48 from wschmrdr(a)gmail.com --- On the Linux Mint side: Hit:2 https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu jammy InRelease No error seen related to WINE. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48264 Gero <gero45(a)mr-gero.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|gero45(a)mr-gero.de | -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
WineHQ Bugzilla