June 2001 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: PATCH: set_thread_buffer fixed
by Gerard Patel June 3, 2001

June 3, 2001

At 07:19 PM 02/06/2001 +0200, you wrote: <snip> >I have now changed config.h to only enable 64bit support for glibc 2.2 >or better. After applying your patch to current cvs, rm config.cache, ./configure, make depend && make Wine crashes as before. Did you leave something to for Alexandre Julliard implicit (he certainly knows about this stuff, I don't) ? I don't understand why _FILE_OFFSET_BITS is still defined in config.h.in. Gerard

3 2

Re: PATCH: set_thread_buffer fixed
by Alexandre Julliard June 2, 2001

June 2, 2001

Marcus Meissner <marcus(a)jet.franken.de> writes: > Enable 64bit file operations on Linux only for glibc 2.2 or better, > since mmap64 is broken on glibc 2.1. It would be much better to do a configure check. Including features.h from config.h is very ugly IMO (not to mention that mmap64 seems to work fine on my glibc 2.1.3...) -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

2 1

Re: PATCH: set_thread_buffer fixed
by Ove Kaaven June 2, 2001

June 2, 2001

On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Marcus Meissner wrote: > -/* This is for glibc on Linux, it will turn on 64 bit file support at compile time */ > -#define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64 > +#include <features.h> > +/* This is for glibc on Linux, it will turn on 64 bit file support at > + * compile time > + * Since glibc 2.1.x has various degrees of broken mmap64 prototypes, > + * we do not use this on glibc 2.1.x systems. > + */ > +#if (__GLIBC__ >= 2) && (__GLIBC_MINOR__ > 1) > +# define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64 > +#endif > + That's probably not going to work. The features.h is the only header that checks whether _FILE_OFFSET_BITS is defined, and it's protected against multiple inclusion, so _FILE_OFFSET_BITS must be defined *before* you include features.h. If you must check version, use autoconf.

1 0

Re: set_thread_buffer (fwd)
by lawson_whitney＠juno.com June 2, 2001

June 2, 2001

This seems to have bounced once. Hope winehq feels better soon. On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Patel_=3Cgerard.patel=40nerim.net=3E?=(a)tourian.nerim.net wrote: > Just what I have. > > if you verify if you have the same problem as myself, with current cvs > remove the line defining _FILE_OFFSET_BITS. This fixes it for me. > > Gerard > By this I understood to rip #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64 out of config.h (and acconfig.h just to be sure) and rerun make. It recompiles nearly everything, of course, and makes a wine that will run my app again, so I guess it is the same problem. Now, what is the problem? :-/ glibc-2.1.3 - from Mandrake 7.2 - ?? - I am fairly sure I haven't munged any headers myself.. but Mandrake might have. Are <linux/ and <asm/ considered glibc headers? I don't see them in the rpm, but some motorist broke both my legs a while ago and it is too tough to change the CD and see what is in Slackware's glibc-2.1.2. I guess that wouldn't be conclusive anyway. gcc-2.95.2 locally built, with genuine strength-reduce bug. kernel 2.4.4 with devfs? Other? Feels to me like an inconsistancy between headers and library -? Lawson ---cut--- ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

1 0

Re:AnimateWindow() constants?
by Eric Pouech June 2, 2001

June 2, 2001

> I am about to implement the AnimateWindow() function, but I don't have up to > date windows headers. I did some trial and error on a win98 box and came up > with what I think are the correct values, but could somebody check? all correct A+ --------------- Eric Pouech (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.pouech/) The future will be better tomorrow, Vice President Dan Quayle __________________________________________________ Voila vous propose une boite aux lettres gratuite sur Voila Mail: http://mail.voila.fr

1 0

wine-users down?
by Francois Gouget June 1, 2001

June 1, 2001

Hi, I didn't receive any message on wine-users since May 30th. Is the mailing list down or is it a problem on my end? There's been many messages since then on the newsgroup. Btw, why is the link to the wine-users archive disabled on WineHQ? (http://www.winehq.com/dev.shtml#ml) I found wine-users archives via Google: http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-users/ And I see in the mailing list archives that there's no message since May 30th either. Looks like a mailing list problem to me... Last question (for this email...): Why do the mailing list archives point to the Integrita archives rather than the WineHQ archives? Is there an advantage of one over the other? -- Francois Gouget fgouget(a)free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/ I haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on tape around here somewhere...

2 1

AnimateWindow() constants?
by Bobby Bingham June 1, 2001

June 1, 2001

I am about to implement the AnimateWindow() function, but I don't have up to date windows headers. I did some trial and error on a win98 box and came up with what I think are the correct values, but could somebody check? AW_SLIDE 0x00040000 AW_ACTIVATE 0x00020000 AW_BLEND 0x00080000 AW_HIDE 0x00010000 AW_CENTER 0x00000010 AW_HOR_POSITIVE 0x00000001 AW_HOR_NEGATIVE 0x00000002 AW_VER_POSITIVE 0x00000004 AW_VER_NEGATIVE 0x00000008 I'm pretty sure about all of them except AW_BLEND because win98 doesn't implement it. Thanks in advance Bobby Bingham uhmmmm(a)ameritech.net

1 0

Finding (or not) the exact number of args
by Gaël de Chalendar June 1, 2001

June 1, 2001

Hi, I'm trying to implement stubs for some missing ordinal functions in shlwapi. Reading the NOTES comment in dlls/shlwapi/ordinal.c I don't know if it is a good idea, but it allows explorer.exe (Win 98) to show its desktop and it is what I'm testing (just for fun. I do not hope to be able to use it right now). Anyway, it uses at a moment or another unimplemented ordinal functions. To implement their stubs, I begins with a lot of args, reducing this number until the function is passed. It seems to work but I wonder if I do not add only problems with this strategy. If I left the stack in a corrupted state, maybe the problem will become visible a lot later... I was not able to find in docs, mails archives or google groups any useful tip to find (simply) the right number of args. Particularly, the URL http://www.ece.cmu.edu/afs/ece/usr/dacut/www/src is dead. So, do I continue ? If yes, in this way or differently ? Thanks for your advices. Gael. PS: I will not read my mail until monday 28.

3 4

Re: critical section blocking
by Duane Clark June 1, 2001

June 1, 2001

Aric Stewart wrote: > > Working with QuickTime5 I found a situation where mouse messages could > lockup wine. This leaving and entering the critical section resolves > that bug. > > -aric > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Index: windows/message.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/wine/wine/windows/message.c,v With this patch, Myst locks up solid as soon as the mouse is moved into the Myst window. Without it, Myst works fine. Duane

3 2

Can MAPI be directed to sendmail from a Windows app on Wine ?
by Steve Ball June 1, 2001

June 1, 2001

I am running a windows voicemail server under wine and it runs extremely well, but I believe there is no MAPI support in Wine, and the voicemail server complains that there is no MAPI provider. I would not want to install a Windows email client even if I thought I could use MAPI, and would much prefer to use sendmail as the MAPI sender. I don't think it would be difficult to write code that would produce a sendmail mail message from a Wine stub, but I cannot find where the MAPI support goes and I know very little about MAPI under Windows, since I have done very little Windows programming. Has anyone done this before, or could anyone direct me to the hooks in Wine, and preferably some information on how MAPI works in Windows apps. The Wine project is a fantastic achievement, I hope that I can give something back. Steve Ball

1 0

Re: wineps include fix.
by Ian Pilcher June 1, 2001

June 1, 2001

David Hammerton wrote: > > hi, seems you have done some updating on it.. but now it still doesnt compile, > im not sure if your trying to include something that is defined elsewhere or > you made a typo, but it seems to bawk on: > > gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -g -O2 > -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -fPIC -D__WINE__ -D_REENTRANT > -I/usr/X11R6/include -o truetype.o truetype.c > truetype.c:13: `#include' expects "FILENAME" or <FILENAME> > truetype.c:14: `#include' expects "FILENAME" or <FILENAME> > I give up. You're getting the error because FreeType's macros are not being defined by your include files. This is supposed to be the way to work around the fact that the FreeType guys rename their include files with every minor release. freetype/freetype.h should either define the macros or include another file that does so. If you can figure out why that isn't happening, let me know. -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher ian.pilcher(a)home.com ========================================================================

5 9

Re: WINE server messages
by Alexandre Julliard May 31, 2001

May 31, 2001

David Howells <dhowells(a)redhat.com> writes: > Actually, I see that you do maintain a view list in the client as well as the > module list and section lists in the server. What I was thinking of was just > consolidating the three into a single view list and a single section list in > the server. > > In effect, Wine'd still have the module list, it's just that there'd be > non-modules in the list too. I still don't see why you want that. The fact that the section list is in the client or in the server is orthogonal to the fact that we maintain a list of modules. If you have a list of mapped views in the server you can simplify the module list a bit by making each module point to the view instead of the backing file, but you still need a module list to send debugger events and do toolhelp snapshots. You could of course hide the module list inside the section list by adding some magic flags to the section descriptor, but all it changes is that you then need to walk the whole section list to retrieve the modules; I don't really see the point. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

1 0